Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: econjack
What you fail to see is that problems like this spread beyond the companies that make bad decisions. That makes it a problem of the government's concern.

And the government didn't bail out the S&L's. We covered that yesterday. The government was the insurer of S&L deposits. The government had to provide money to its insurance corporation.

29 posted on 08/10/2007 6:32:48 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62
...the government didn't bail out the S&L's.

You still don't get it, do you? First, Congress had to appropriate over $30 billion to bail out the S&L's. This was because the insurance premiums paid by the S&L's to insure the deposits was inadequate to cover the losses. This means they used MY money to pay off bad loans made by the S&L's. That's a bailout. Second, I'm not sure I even agree with the gov't being in the insurance business. Why am I paying Nagin to rebuild New Orleans? I don't see them coming to Indiana to rebuild here after a tornado. To me, that's a bailout for NO. You can call the payments to the S&L's whatever you want, but when they come into my pocket to seek federal tax money to pay to private companies, that's a bailout.

52 posted on 08/10/2007 7:07:52 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

I agree with “econjack.”

It was a BAIL OUT!!!


167 posted on 08/10/2007 8:53:08 PM PDT by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson