Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: impimp1

Top 10 GISS U.S. Temperature deviation (deg C) in New Order 8/7/2007

Year Old New
1934 1.23 1.25
1998 1.24 1.23
1921 1.12 1.15
2006 1.23 1.13
1931 1.08 1.08
1999 0.94 0.93
1953 0.91 0.90
1990 0.88 0.87
1938 0.85 0.86
1939 0.84 0.85

Here’s the old order of top 10 yearly temperatures.

Year Old New
1998 1.24 1.23
1934 1.23 1.25
2006 1.23 1.13
1921 1.12 1.15
1931 1.08 1.08
1999 0.94 0.93
1953 0.91 0.90
2001 0.90 0.76
1990 0.88 0.87
1938 0.85 0.86

Note the years with the biggest error adjustment in the top 10 - 2006 and 2001 are the two most recent years in the top ten. 2006 goes from tied for second to fourth, but instead of being bunched near the top, it is middle of the pack. 2001 falls out of the top ten altogether, and is now altogether unremarkable in terms of temperature.

This is hugh!

I also find it ... remarkable... that the biggest errors have occured as the global warming hysteria have been ramping up. It is almost as if somebody were intentionally fudging the data in order to support a political position. But we all know that could never, ever happen.


24 posted on 08/09/2007 12:59:28 PM PDT by gridlock (You cannot coexist with somebody who wants you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gridlock

neat data


39 posted on 08/09/2007 1:09:40 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: gridlock
Remember the satellite deal a couple of months ago ~ QuikScat I think it was called ~ a NOAA guy, Bill Proenza, ended up being relieved because he thought it useful to replace this satellite and HIS STAFF DID NOT AGREE.

And what does that satellite do? Well, it determines, based on observation of windspeed and precipitation, that a weather system actually becomes a hurricane.

Absent this satellite NOAA would use computer analysis to examine images from other satellites to guess what could have been a hurricane.

In short without QuikScat it'd be up to Proenza's former subordinates to artfully judge what was really a hurricane.

I'd start looking to them to find out who was ramping up the Global Warming hysteria by, among other things, misrepresenting data.

We could probably get some answers pretty quick with a little waterboarding (which seems soooooo relevant for weather guys).

60 posted on 08/09/2007 2:14:21 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: gridlock
I also find it ... remarkable... that the biggest errors have occured as the global warming hysteria have been ramping up. It is almost as if somebody were intentionally fudging the data in order to support a political position. But we all know that could never, ever happen.

Looking at the reason for the errors...it looks more like hubris, and no real peer-review.

61 posted on 08/09/2007 2:18:25 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson