Skip to comments.
S. Carolina Pushes Primary Up to Jan. 19 [chain reaction begins - Iowa Caucus in December]
Associated Press ^
| August 9, 2007
| New Hampshire
Posted on 08/09/2007 10:33:12 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: EternalVigilance
Well, hells bells! Why don’t we just start NEXT TUESDAY and get it over with!?!?!?!?!?!?!
2
posted on
08/09/2007 10:34:33 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(All I know about Minnesota, I learned from Garrison Keilor.............)
To: Jim Robinson; Waywardson; Broadside; Gelato; Taxman; Ladycalif
3
posted on
08/09/2007 10:35:08 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(When Romney got done in MA, there were more Green Party candidates than Republican candidates...)
To: EternalVigilance
Fred better hurry and declare, or it might be too late to get on the ballot.
4
posted on
08/09/2007 10:35:35 AM PDT
by
Between the Lines
(I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
To: Red Badger
Shhh...they might hear ya...
;-)
5
posted on
08/09/2007 10:35:39 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(When Romney got done in MA, there were more Green Party candidates than Republican candidates...)
To: EternalVigilance
So are we going to hold the election in Feb. of 2008? Or is the election process going to hold?
Then again, if we don’t like the outcome we can always push the reset button.
6
posted on
08/09/2007 10:36:17 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Freedom is the right of all sentient beings - Peter Cullen as Optimus Prime)
To: EternalVigilance
January 3? Going once, going twice, gone and no takers yet.
7
posted on
08/09/2007 10:37:31 AM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: EternalVigilance
This is retarded. We ought to have a national day for primaries. Fighting for dates is just retarded.
8
posted on
08/09/2007 10:38:04 AM PDT
by
Bogey78O
(Don't call them jihadis. Call them irhabis. Tick them off, don't entertain their delusion.)
To: wastedyears
A large proportion of the delegates will be chosen by February.
What remains to be seen is what the Law of Unintended Consequences has in store for the political establishment.
9
posted on
08/09/2007 10:38:06 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(When Romney got done in MA, there were more Green Party candidates than Republican candidates...)
To: Bogey78O
Can’t say I disagree with you. But, it’s reality.
10
posted on
08/09/2007 10:41:38 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(When Romney got done in MA, there were more Green Party candidates than Republican candidates...)
To: EternalVigilance
Moving primares ahead is not in the interest in the American people. Americans will have less choice and it will give opponents time to dig up dirt. Again it’s party and politics over the people.
To: Red Badger
Indiana state senate meets to move primary to September.... next month. /sarcasm
12
posted on
08/09/2007 10:42:15 AM PDT
by
A. Morgan
(Fred Thompson’s record is solid and he does not waffle. Fred for PREZ in 2008!)
To: EternalVigilance
What remains to be seen is what the Law of Unintended Consequences has in store for the political establishment. And what makes this experimenting interesting is the fact that neither party has an incumbent President or VP to run. Those unintended consequences might really make for some wacky results!
13
posted on
08/09/2007 10:42:59 AM PDT
by
hunter112
(Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
To: lilylangtree
Heh...
On January 3rd, most of the political hacks probably won’t be recovered from New Years Eve...
14
posted on
08/09/2007 10:43:27 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(When Romney got done in MA, there were more Green Party candidates than Republican candidates...)
To: EternalVigilance
The demoncrats are so anxious to get their hands on the White House and both branches of Congress.
The problem is that by the time the election actually gets here, everyone will be sick of the candidates.
Are we going to start the run for the 20012 election the day after the inauguration January 2009?
This is sheer stupidity.
15
posted on
08/09/2007 10:43:33 AM PDT
by
BMC1
(ISLAM AND DEMOCRATS ARE THE ARMY OF SATAN. THEY ARE AL-MUFSIDOON (CRIMINALS BOUND FOR HELL.))
To: hunter112
16
posted on
08/09/2007 10:43:54 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(When Romney got done in MA, there were more Green Party candidates than Republican candidates...)
To: mefistofelerevised
I agree. But, here we are.
17
posted on
08/09/2007 10:44:47 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(When Romney got done in MA, there were more Green Party candidates than Republican candidates...)
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: EternalVigilance
Yep, it’s possible that both nominees will be known by Feb. 5th, when many states have primaries, and after whatever happens in N.H., Iowa, etc. has influenced those primaries. If Hillary rolls to victory in Iowa and NH, and a Republican does the same, we could know in early January who the nominees will be, a full 7 months before the conventions and 10 months before the general election. Geez, this sure sounds like we live in a permanent campaign season.
To: Dilbert San Diego
20
posted on
08/09/2007 10:46:07 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(When Romney got done in MA, there were more Green Party candidates than Republican candidates...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson