See post 59, it is not only a widely used misquote, it's impossible for me to believe it's an accidental misquote.
Conceded and agreed.
When most people use the quote on isolationists terms, they use the latter half only, which simply states we need not become involved in foreign entanglements that don’t concern us or our interests directly.
If we are already involved by other means, those committments should be fulfilled.
And if you’ll see # 38, you’ll see the statement by mnehrling that I originally responded to.
And I stand by that post wholeheartedly. That goes directly back to interpretation of constitutional intent and is at the very heart of the terms liberal vs. conservative.