Instead of making a useless comment, why don’t you rebut with something substantive ?
YOU might think my comment is useless, but it merely suggests that the author is a whack job. First off-"ADHD Fraud". I agree that the diagnosis is overused, but there are legitimate cases of ADHD. Second, "the “big lie” ad campaign from the psychiatric-pharmaceutical cartel that psychiatric disorders/ and chemical imbalances are actual diseases"; that sounds like a liberal conspiracy theory, ala "Big Tobacco" is out to get us. Third, this article is teeming with misspellings. e.g. Cat après (coniine) (should be Catapres/clonidine), Ellaville (should be Elavil), amitrityline (should be amitriptyline), etc. Fourth-there is no link to this article; where did it come from? It doesn't deserve anything more substantive than the comment I made....