To: All; Rudder
Ron Paul is very pro-life, but not as pro-life as Sam Brownback and Duncan Hunter.
Sometimes Ron Paul’s libertarian views get in the way:
From this site,
http://senate.ontheissues.org/Ron_Paul.htm
Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005
Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999
SHOULDN’T PARENTS DECIDE WHAT IS BEST FOR THEIR MINOR CHILDREN??
47 posted on
08/08/2007 10:21:04 PM PDT by
Sun
(Duncan Hunter: pro-life/borders, understands Red China threat! http://www.gohunter08.com/Home.aspx)
To: Sun
From this site, http://senate.ontheissues.org/Ron_Paul.htm
Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005) Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
Didn't you forget the part where he was rated 0% by NARAL? Maybe you overlooked that.
55 posted on
08/08/2007 10:30:44 PM PDT by
George W. Bush
(Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
To: Sun
“SHOULDNT PARENTS DECIDE WHAT IS BEST FOR THEIR MINOR CHILDREN??”
Exactly correct... NOT FEDGOV. Which is what Dr. Paul is saying... in a MOST CONSISTENT way, unlike too many of you.
58 posted on
08/08/2007 10:33:25 PM PDT by
dcwusmc
(We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
To: Sun
Frankly, parents should NOT have available the option of abortion for their minor children, and it is NOT good for them to have an abortion. If the parents cared about their minor children, they would not have them in a situation where having sex is possible. And if they cared about their minor children, they would labor with sweat and tears in the area of training the mind set and morality of their children from infancy to make immoral practices repugnant to them.
So, some will say, “John, you have no right to impose your family’s standards on anyone else’s family.” Of course, that would be a ridiculous remark, unless the remarker were to name a family under which my standards have been imposed. I gave principle. I imposed nothing. Of course, a sane person will realize that recommending one’s standards (that is what an opinion is), is what FR is all about. Without the “I think,” “I believe,” “This is what we should do” on these threads, there would be no threads.
To: Sun
Sometimes Ron Paul’s libertarian views get in the way: From this site, http://senate.ontheissues.org/Ron_Paul.htm Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005 Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999 Thank you for posting this.. more evidence that Ron Paul isn't the second coming of Alexander Hamilton, more like Chuck Hagel's older, crazier brother.
130 posted on
08/09/2007 6:27:45 AM PDT by
mnehring
(Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson