National Taxpayers Union and the Hair club for Growth both use “free trade” votes in their weighing process, if I’m not mistaken.
I listed many of the votes they used, yet you have not addressed even one of them. Instead, you have gone off on a tangent over issues that were not even brought up. It seems that you are unwilling to defend the votes in question because they are indefensible. I could understand it if you said that you support him despite his big spending because of other issues, but quit trying to ignore that he is a big spender.