Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: uncbob
All of that can be done on temporary cooperation basis between the nations you mentioned as the wimpouts. But if they are wimpouts (and I agree with that), don’t expect them in UNO operations either

The UNO is also made up of nations who are very clearly backing, supporting and training our enemies. To think that when the UNO is involved with its perpetual-war-for-perpetual-peace troops, that our enemies aren’t informed about military operations is ludicrous. You can’t get much more anti-America than the UNO.

European nations are no more obligated to contribute troops to this cause through the UNO than they are without the UNO.

We don’t need the UNO — at all(!) — and we should not be lending any more to its supposed credibility.

351 posted on 08/10/2007 5:32:16 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies ]


To: John Leland 1789

You don’t really think the UN is going to supply troops do you

BTW I think we should just get out of the UN

But that has nothing to do with this inane argument about Nation Building or Empire expanding

Since we now don’t have a big enough military to seize and hold the oil fields ( which we should have done under Bush I )
we may be screwed


352 posted on 08/10/2007 5:45:51 AM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson