Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul Right, Romney Wrong on Iraq and 9/11
John Birch Society ^ | 8-8-07 | Gary Benoit

Posted on 08/08/2007 1:30:04 PM PDT by CJ Wolf

Ron Paul was right during the Des Moines Republican debate when he said that our going into Iraq had nothing to do with al-Qaeda. And Mitt Romney was wrong when he interrupted him.

At the Republican debate in Des Moines, Iowa, on August 5, Congressman Ron Paul made clear that our going to war against Iraq had nothing to do with going after al-Qaeda, the terrorist group that attacked us on 9/11.

"The neoconservatives promoted this war many, many years before it was started," Paul said during the debate. "It had nothing to do with al-Qaeda. There was no al-Qaeda in Iraq." As Ron Paul elaborated on how wrong the neocons have been, Governor Romney, apparently attempting to telegraph his disgust with the congressman’s remarks, snidely said to the audience, "Has he forgotten about 9/11?" as he gestured with his hands. A couple seconds later, Romney again rudely interrupted — "Have you forgotten about..." — as Paul continued using the time allotted to him.

Later in the debate, Paul revisited the subject of al-Qaeda. "I supported going after the al-Qaeda into Afghanistan," he said, "but, lo and behold, the neocons took over. They forgot about Osama bin Laden. And what they did, they went into nation- building, not only in Afghanistan, they went unjustifiably over into Iraq. And that’s why we’re in this mess today."

Put simply, Ron Paul does not believe we went into Iraq because of 9/11. But Mitt Romney obviously believes we did. So who’s right?

It is true that President Bush and other neocons in his administration have repeatedly juxtaposed references to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq to those of 9/11 in their public statements. In so doing, they have created the impression among many Americans — apparently including Romney — that Saddam Hussein had attacked us on 9/11. But the administration did not explicitly say this and did not even present evidence supporting this allegation. As President Bush himself said on September 17, 2003: "We’ve had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th [attacks]."

The administration did portray an al-Qaeda/Iraq connection as a concrete fact. Yet in a January 8, 2004 press conference, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell acknowledged: "There is not — you know, I have not seen smoking-gun, concrete evidence about the connection, but I think the possibility of such connections did exist and it was prudent to consider them at the time that we did." In truth, the evidence simply was not there.

By interrupting Congressman Paul with his "Has he forgotten about 9/11?" protestation, Governor Romney not only made himself appear less than presidential, he also confirmed that, where Iraq is concerned, he does not know what he’s talking about.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; 911truthers; asseenonstormfront; icecreammandrake; iraq; jbs; johnbirchsociety; lunaticfringe; mrspaulsshrimp; patbuchananlite; paul; paulbearers; paulestinians; porkzilla; preciousbodilyfluids; romney; sapandimpurify; tinfoilhats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-354 next last
To: curiosity; CJ Wolf

JBS posts are generally discouraged. I’m inclined to let this one stay.


81 posted on 08/08/2007 2:20:09 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
I’m ok with cutting their throats and leaving victorious though.

Last night, our forces combined with Iraqi forces wiped out 32 Mahdi Army scum and captured about a dozen more.

As I type this, another operation appears to have gotten underway, judging by the sounds I am hearing.

This is definitely not the time to quit. So much ground has been gained in just the last few weeks.

82 posted on 08/08/2007 2:20:21 PM PDT by Allegra (9 - ssssingle digit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Thank you. Won’t happen again.


83 posted on 08/08/2007 2:21:55 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
they have created the impression among many Americans — apparently including Romney — that Saddam Hussein had attacked us on 9/11

Only to those too ignorant to follow a line of reasoning more than 4 words long and that doesn't rhyme.

By interrupting Congressman Paul with his "Has he forgotten about 9/11?" protestation, Governor Romney not only made himself appear less than presidential, he also confirmed that, where Iraq is concerned, he does not know what he’s talking about.

No, he showed that he understands that the 21st Century's biggest threat is non-state actors who receive willing or unwilling support from rougue or hostile regimes to carry out extremely effective 4th generation or asymmetric warfare against the US and it's allies. Anyone who doesn't understand that the shocking lesson of 9/11 is about more than any one man or one organization or one government is stuck in the 19th Centuy.

Nuff said. It's more productive to go back to that off-topic Civil War debate from yesterday. Unless someone wants to talk evolution vs creationism ;^)
just kidding folks...

84 posted on 08/08/2007 2:22:32 PM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
And Mitt Romney was wrong when he interrupted him.

Anyone who interrupts Ron Paul is RIGHT.

85 posted on 08/08/2007 2:22:51 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
He, like his allies on the left and loony (far) right (buchananites etc), wish to wait until the terrorists are killing in the streets of America.

LLS

86 posted on 08/08/2007 2:24:02 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

Good news and stay safe.


87 posted on 08/08/2007 2:24:44 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
I think I'm going to pass on pinging to JBS writing. JBS, over the years, attracted so many conspiracy mongers, survivalists, etc. that despite the fact that they ejected such persons on a regular basis, they acquired a reputation as kooks. It's a shame because they were, in truth, such a hardcore anticommunist organization during most of the Cold War.

They are correct in the article though. Romney was demonstrating he either believes in or wishes to disingenuously peddle a connection between Saddam and 9/11.
88 posted on 08/08/2007 2:25:20 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Good call...


89 posted on 08/08/2007 2:25:50 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I am not really a Fred basher, I am a Paulitroll. THOMPSON 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

Ron Paul’s “just war” terminology is a coward’s excuse to avoid defending the nation.
Paul is dangerously incompetent, and UNFIT TO COMMAND!

Paul will neither defend his country, nor will he uphold our military alliances.
Only fools worship at the altar of Ron Paul.


90 posted on 08/08/2007 2:28:02 PM PDT by Cyclops08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

I think he’d defend this country.


91 posted on 08/08/2007 2:31:19 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf; Cyclops08
I think he would sit in the oval office spinning his chair around because he couldn’t find the words ‘football’ or ‘red phone’ in the Constitution.
92 posted on 08/08/2007 2:32:57 PM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

with what? Letters of the Marque? Pirates?
Don’t make me laugh.


93 posted on 08/08/2007 2:33:15 PM PDT by Cyclops08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08
Jack Sparrow, Jihadist Slayer...
94 posted on 08/08/2007 2:35:26 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I am not really a Fred basher, I am a Paulitroll. THOMPSON 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

“Romney was demonstrating he either believes in or wishes to disingenuously peddle a connection between Saddam and 9/11.”

Actually to be fair to Romney, he didn’t get a chance to explain that remark. It could have meant that he agrees with the preemptive war policy Bush has set and that taking out Saddam was a way to prevent future 9/11s or he could believe that Saddam was responsible for 911, when we all know it was the Chinese. ;-)


95 posted on 08/08/2007 2:36:49 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Allegra; soccermom

Oh brother.


96 posted on 08/08/2007 2:40:46 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

I think he’d secure the border. I think he’d respond with overwhelming force to any attacks. I think he’d disregard the UN, when we need to declare war. And yes he’d use the Letters of Marque to equip and fund private death squads to attack our enemies. I think he’d surprise you.


97 posted on 08/08/2007 2:41:25 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

You stay safe..


98 posted on 08/08/2007 2:42:11 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Remember, to Paulistineans there is no guilt by association regardless of whom that association is with. That’s rule one in their cult handbook.
99 posted on 08/08/2007 2:42:21 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
Thank you very much LLS. Just showing simple and proven facts to some people who do not want the hear the truth, the Paulestinians.
100 posted on 08/08/2007 2:42:38 PM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-354 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson