Skip to comments.
Paul Right, Romney Wrong on Iraq and 9/11
John Birch Society ^
| 8-8-07
| Gary Benoit
Posted on 08/08/2007 1:30:04 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 341-354 next last
To: jrooney
“Some” here either do not KNOW about our tactics that won the Cold War, don’t understand what it is that we did to win the Cold War, or they KNOW exactly what we did and do not want us to win Cold War II (Russia is playing hardball and this is undeniable). This is not surprising because many of them want us to lose via surrender in Iraq.
LLS
201
posted on
08/08/2007 5:23:29 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: Siobhan
Oh well, Dubai wasn’t in the crosshairs after all we were going to give them our ports... Yea, we see how that turned out.. we lost the chance to put agents in all DPI ports around the world and oversee their security procedures.. yep, another step back because too many people wanted to knee jerk react instead of looking into it a little more..
202
posted on
08/08/2007 5:23:38 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
To: jveritas
Get real and stop the conspiracy theories.Last I checked I am real, and I don't trade in conspiracy theories. Russia is our main enemy no matter what smoke and mirrors was achieved with perestroika, glastnost, and Gorbachoff's ouster and eventual relocation to the USA.
203
posted on
08/08/2007 5:24:55 PM PDT
by
Siobhan
(America without God is dead.)
To: kabar
Regardless of Paul’s view on terrorism, you can’t discredit him because he still supports tight border security and interior enforcement. And he’d immediately ask Congress for a declaration rather than waiting for the UN. Which pretty much blows the “they’ll follow us here” argument to shreds.
To: bnelson44
Do that many Freepers want to legalize drugs? Drugs are legal.
You just can't make your own.
But if you've got the right doctor... 8^)
205
posted on
08/08/2007 5:25:48 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Proud to be a conservative! Proud to support Duncan Hunter for President!)
To: Siobhan
Ah yes, fluoridation of water ... a gift to America from Nazi science used in the death camps... OK, sounds like someone has been drinking too much fluoridated water in their kook aid.
206
posted on
08/08/2007 5:26:23 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
To: mnehrling
If it had been made plain that it was an attempt to respond to Hutchison Wampoa’s (Chinese) control of ports, it would have gotten more people on board with it I think. But hindsight and all of that...
207
posted on
08/08/2007 5:26:39 PM PDT
by
Siobhan
(America without God is dead.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
208
posted on
08/08/2007 5:26:54 PM PDT
by
kabar
To: CJ Wolf
Please explain the difference between Ron Pat Paulson’s views on Iraq and Cindy Sheehag’s?
Pray for W and Our Troops
209
posted on
08/08/2007 5:26:55 PM PDT
by
bray
(Member of the FR President Bush underground)
To: LibLieSlayer
I agree.
"Russia is playing hardball and this is undeniable"
With Russia wanting to arm Iran with a 20 billion plus deal, I can understand the US wanting to arm Saudia Arabia to offset their influence. Another arms race? It appears just maybe in the middle east, courtesy of the Russians.
210
posted on
08/08/2007 5:26:58 PM PDT
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: jrooney
Ron Paul would fight terror and our enemies on defense, AFTER they have attacked us on our soil. Exactly the opponent al Qaeda and our foreign enemies would like to fight.Yes, that's the strategy.
211
posted on
08/08/2007 5:27:41 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
To: Siobhan
Russia and the Soviets lost the war long time ago and they are not our “main enemy” anymore and they are not a main ally either. Our main enemy today and for the distant future is “Islamic Terrorism”.
212
posted on
08/08/2007 5:28:43 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush.)
To: Siobhan
To: april15Bendovr; GMMAC; Clive
214
posted on
08/08/2007 5:29:38 PM PDT
by
fanfan
("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
To: Siobhan
Justify pre-emption for your own nation, and another nation like a great Russian bear will use the same to justify pre-emptive strikes. It is current US policy to not rule out first-use of nuclear weapons. Do you think we should change that policy, which is the cornerstone of our nuclear deterence? Should we wait for an enemy to attack first before responding?
215
posted on
08/08/2007 5:31:16 PM PDT
by
kabar
To: Siobhan
Have you ever actually read these claims, I mean really read them..they are all a big circle of proof.. one person refers to another who refers to another’s claim and so on as proof.. and it ends up being one big circle reference.. the whole ‘fluoride is about mind or behavior control’ is about the worst.. I’ve followed this one back and the real scientific evidence isn’t there.. there are a lot of claims some mysterious study or proof exists, but no one can seem to find it..
One of the big problem with the fluoride myth is that some conspiracies refer back to sodium fluoride (that is toxic), but they fail to note that the fluoride that is in some water supplies and in dental gels is monobasic fluoride, a different substance...
216
posted on
08/08/2007 5:32:12 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
To: CJ Wolf
this goes back to the coulda woulda argument. Pre-9/11 We knew Al Queda wanted to strike our soil, we never responded to the Cole or many other attacks. Im pretty sure Paul wouldnt let that stand like our other leaders did. Nor would he let future attacks stand. Of course not, he would have issued Letters of Marque.
Are you suggesting he would have attacked terrorist bases in Yemin, in Somalia, in Lebanon, and, of course the nation of Iraq who fired on our troops on a daily basis.
I would have supported those actions, but you know he wouldn't.
In fact none of those forces would be there. The middle east would be an Islamic/Soviet lake, safe transit for oil I'm sure. And yes, I think access to oil is a legitimate national interest. As to future attacks, there will be none once we've withdrawn our forces from around the world, we'll have no enemies, so future attacks are irrelevant.
217
posted on
08/08/2007 5:32:17 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
To: jveritas
With Gorbachaev (spelled correctly?) throwing verbal attacks against this adminstration and the US recently, I think there is much envy and anger towards us from the old school communist thought there. I do not think Russia is our enemy but I do think hey would revel in our collapse. Maybe that is why they support some of our enemies.
218
posted on
08/08/2007 5:32:21 PM PDT
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: CJ Wolf
I had no idea the John Birch Society still existed — I suspect it’s now just John Birch with a website.
219
posted on
08/08/2007 5:33:32 PM PDT
by
BfloGuy
(It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
To: kabar
Do you deny that the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia is a target of AQ? Dude, I don't care about the Saudi government, OK?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 341-354 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson