[raybbr]

I love how the article just blows past the issue:

I love how critics just blow past the issue:

The fact is much of Bonds' work from 1999 to 2004 -- during a time many of us believe he was juiced -- can't be touched by an asterisk. Baseball had no policy against steroids during this time.You can't break a rule that wasn't there.

I have no feelings about Bonds whatsoever. I just think that he's being tarnished because he's not a media suck-up.

[Mr. Jeeves]

I just think that he's being tarnished because he's not a media suck-up.

That's exactly it. The Keith Olbermann-wannabe sportswriters are leading the attacks, while real athletes like Mike Schmidt, Tony Gwynn, and Dusty Baker are all firmly backing Bonds.

[GOP_Party_Animal]

Baseball had no policy against steroids during this time. You can't break a rule that wasn't there.

Ah, the old "Hey, it's unethical but legal" argument. No controlling legal authority. Bill Clinton and friends would be proud.