If you compare Bonds HR production in his first five MLB careers (when he wasn’t juiced) to Aaron’s first five years, Bonds has more HR’s per at-bat.
Let me get this straight, on the one hand you say that Bond is the HR king, while on the other you acknowledge that overwhelming probability that he cheated?
2. Even looking at the numbers in the years when there was a very low or even no probability that Bonds was juicing, Bonds produced more HR's per at-bat than Aaron.
If you compare the first 10 years of each of their careers, (when Bonds was skinny and many fans feel he wasn't on the juice) Bonds' HR's per at-bats exceeded Aaron's six out of those ten years.