Ron Paul Launches TV Ads

KWTX TV ^ | 08/07/07 | uknown

[CJ Wolf]

well stated.

[jrooney]

Thank you but it is not necessary to thank me. Have a good night.

[JoinJuniorAchievement]

Frankly I could care less whether you would let Paul pay for your ticket or not. But his campaign has 948 or some number to dole out. I’m sure they will find others to partake of his generousity.

Ron Paul is as frugal with our campaign contributions as he is with Tax dollars.
Multiply whatever the FEC says he has by 100, and you might be close.
When I worked on the Bush 2004 and the martinez campaigns, they begged us to grab as many bumperstickers and yard signs as we could.
In the Ron paul campaign we are begging the HQ to sell us the signs and bumperstickers and *not* give any away. What a change.
McCain and Thompson have limited what we can contribute to a mere $2300.
Attacking the Bill of Rights should make you angry.

[JoinJuniorAchievement]

I’m doing the same thing - protecting and defending the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic and from crazy people like Ron Paul.

Go get a brain scan.
Following the Constitution means it is your DUTY to support Ron paul.
otherwise you are the betrayer.

[JoinJuniorAchievement]

There are things in the Constitution that have been overtaken by events, by time. Declaration of war is one of them. There are things no longer relevant to a modern society. Why declare war if you don’t have to?

Who here wants Hillary to have this power?
Fact: we have never "won" an undeclared War. (besides grenada) (Ronald Reagan is still a legend, afterall.)
We cannot allow safe havens in Iran, Pakistan and Syria to exist. W is allowing this, time to come home until we have the resolve to finish it once and for all. That is not the situation today.
We should be screaming "Salman Pak!" like we did "remember the Alamo!"

[JoinJuniorAchievement]

Thank you fellow Patriot.
There is always a way to win. If we don't, the country gets Hillary.
The MSM's favorites can't beat her.

[Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek]

“How do you suppose he’s going to vote on them?”

I don’t know.

‘You know exactly how he’s going to vote on them.’

You may be able to read minds, but I not only can’t read Ron Paul’s mind, but I can’t read anyone else’s mind either. More power to you, and other mind-readers like you.

Or are you just saying that Ron Paul is so consistent that you can be fairly sure how he is going to vote based on your analysis of past performance? If so, then too bad we don’t have more legislators like that. Or do you think such consistency is quite common?

[JTN]

You may be able to read minds, but I not only can’t read Ron Paul’s mind, but I can’t read anyone else’s mind either. More power to you, and other mind-readers like you.

No mind reading is necessary.

Or are you just saying that Ron Paul is so consistent that you can be fairly sure how he is going to vote based on your analysis of past performance?

Yes. I explained his procedure in this area in post 140. I apologize if I misread you here. I read your original post as a slam (and it still reads that way to me), but if you were just looking for feedback, then I'm sorry.

If so, then too bad we don’t have more legislators like that.

Agreed.