To: Bryan
As long as it doesn’t prevent people who are under the legal limit from operating a motor vehicle, I don’t think it’s a bad idea. Don't different states have different legal limits? How would this thing work if you drive accross state lines? Will it suddently shut the car down if you drive into a state with stricter laws than the one you came from?
To: Cementjungle
Don't different states have different legal limits? How would this thing work if you drive accross state lines? Will it suddently shut the car down if you drive into a state with stricter laws than the one you came from?The nationwide standard is 0.08% BAC. In my opinion, if these devices allow someone with 0.079% BAC to drive, they are acceptable. The ones that measure BAC through the skin would only add about $100 to the price of a new car. This is pretty cheap as insurance policies go.
14 posted on
08/07/2007 5:22:36 PM PDT by
Bryan
To: Cementjungle
No, no, no... they all standardized on a national limit of .08. The feds were going to withhold highway money if they didn't. Just like the seatbelt laws.
Big Brother is hard at work 24/7.
21 posted on
08/07/2007 5:28:19 PM PDT by
AFreeBird
(Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
To: Cementjungle
Don't different states have different legal limits? Theoretically, but they all caved to fed money.
422 posted on
08/09/2007 7:59:47 AM PDT by
DungeonMaster
(concerning His promise.....not willing that any (of whom?) should perish but that all...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson