[Clam Digger]

I AM NOT DEFENDING ALCOHOLICS, OR THE RIGHT TO DRIVE DRUNK. THIS PROPOSAL IS A VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. I WISH YOU WOULD STOP WITH YOUR IGNORANT DENIAL OF THE FACTS AT HAND.

YOU HAVE NO CLUE HOW FOOLISH YOU LOOK ON A CONSERVATIVE WEBSITE

[Quix]

Sure could have fooled me . . .

walks like a duck . . . waddles, quacks, floats, bobs head under water, lays eggs, flys, flat bill . . .

Must be an elephant. That’s right a quacking, flying, egg laying elephant. Makes perfect sense.

[Quix]

I guess you’ve missed along the way . . . that really . . . I’m NOT in favor of mandatory breathalizers in every car.

But for the sake of argument . . . I certainly didn’t emphasize my preferences.

And, TO A DEGREE . . . theoretically . . . if it would save massive numbers of lives, it MIGHT be worth considering.

But don’t let me disturb your tirades and rants. They are quite consistent with a particular mentality, preference, pattern of behavior etc.

[Quix]

BTW,
My main
goal
is to
provoke
thought
--SERIOUS THOUGHT--
about
ALCOHOL
AND
ALCOHOLISM
---
PARTICULARLY
ON THE PART OF
CLUELESS,
VULNERABLE
DESPERATE
WOMEN
who so easily
tend to get
hooked up with
the more
VIOLENT,
RAGING,
PATHETIC
flavors of
alcoholics.

And, if thereby, I've helped change the mind of 1 woman; saved the life of one child . . .

Then your petty, ill-informed, un-informed, thoroughly off-the-wall personal assaults and attacks on me will have been much more than worth it.

BTW, thanks for helping me so much to provoke thought. Couldn't have done it so well without you.