This is about civil liberties, not alcohol. They could institute the cheek-spreading policy just as easily, because someone somewhere has cause a car crash while transporting drugs in their rectum.
This idea is a ridiculous trampling of civil liberties, despite your previous experience with lowlife alcoholics who would drive. that certainly doesn't make up the vast majority of drivers and is DEFINITELY not a reason to proclaim everyone guilty.
Quit being a dope. This idea SUCKS.
Quit being a dope. This idea SUCKS.
= = =
Thanks for the thoughtful assaultive personal attack.
So . . . are you also in favor of the great AMERICAN freedom to keep pit-bulls with their chains embedded in their necks . . . fighting to the death for personal gain?
Is recreational alcoholic wife-bashing also a great patriotic freedom, in your perspective?
What do you mean it has nothing to do with alcohol?
How is it that ignition alcohol monitors have NOTHING to do with alcohol? I guess we’ve entered the Twilight Zone.
I’m not thrilled by the prospect of all vehicles so equipped.
But I’m LESS pleased by an infinite degree with the bloody mayhem we now have.
SO, WHAT IS YOUR CLEVER SOLUTION TO THE BLOODY DEADLY MAYHEM WE NOW HAVE . . . if you keep the ignition monitors off the market?
Oh, that’s right . . . you’re not really interested in saving lives . . . only in saving selfish “freedoms.”