I on the other hand would call our state department un American in the sense that they consistently provide funds and support to regimes and ideologues who are anti American. How do you explain Washington's support for FATA or China?
The enemy of our enemy is not always our friend, but Washington hasn’t yet figured that simple lesson out.
Neo-Cons are some of the stupidest people on the planet. They just don’t realize it.
“Obviously you think it’s just great that the US state department supports brutal dictatorships and arms jehadists and others that later become our enemies. “
I sure do. History has shown this can greatly reduce casulties and achive a primary objective. This is why we stopped at the Elbe and allowed the Russians to sacrifice 300,000+ casulties in their efforts to take Berlin.
“Any criticism of that and you call the critic un American.”
Um, no I don’t.
“How do you explain Washington’s support for FATA or China?”
Define ‘support’.
“Neo-Cons are some of the stupidest people on the planet. They just don’t realize it.”
I think the bigger question is, if a neo-con becomes a isolationist shrimp salesman, is the person still a neo-con?