But when Ron Paul says I would go back to the Wilson Doctrine. I'm to believe he really doesn't mean he'd go back to the Wilson Doctrine as he said, but in fact is laying our problem at the feet of Wilson's actions which laid the groundwork for WWII.
Either he has to say what he means, or his supporters have to make the code for the decoder rings available to all.
Why is it every time Ron Paul says something, he doesn't mean it according to his supporters?
That is a rather incoherent interview. My favorite
HE: Follow-up -- thank you -- follow-up question. [Laughter] Take two minutes and tell me the people that you would name to your cabinet or to your official family.RP: Probably, I won’t do a very good job of that because I haven’t thought that through and there are certainly a lot of friends and –
HE: Well, before you name the cabinet people, what cabinet departments would you want to have remain?
RP: Well I guess we could have a Justice Department. I guess we could have a State Department, and I guess we could have a Defense Department, and maybe one or two others more but not many more than that. I mean… We need to think about a Republican form of government. I believe in a republic -- little “R” republic -- and we don’t need a Department of Education and a Department of Energy. We used to win elections on that but not any more. We doubled the size of all those programs.
I won't do a very good job of that [selecting cabinet members], but I've got a lot of friends.
Presidential timber all right.