You’re missing my point.....
If this person were a lesbian fire chief, and did her job of managing the fire department, and putting out and/or preventing fires, I doubt if she would be getting any flak.
The reason we’re all posting is because she ordered these firemen to participate in an “event” that has nothing to do with their job as firemen and is against their beliefs and values. To have these men subjected to these perversions and sexual taunts against their will is outrageous. They should have told their chief, as a group, we will NOT participate and let the chips fall where they may.
What if the chief had been a Christian and ordered all the
firefighters to attend a Christian Bible reading?
She just is not a Christian. The Fire Department is not a private enterprise, and therefore Christian fire chiefs do not force firefighters to attend Christian Bible reading . . .even though it would never hurt them.
Let’s not tolerate sodomy. Let’s not tolerate it displaying itself in public. Let’s not tolerate sodomite officials bringing it out of their “closet” at all.
Apparently I am not missing the point. That is what I meant. Her lesbianism is the issue. It's because she's a lesbian that she's ordering them to do this. Otherwise, I doubt she'd care one way or the other.
Then they would get religion and morality and we would not have perverts in charge of making life or death decisions. We would all be better off if we did not exclude Christianity from government, and if the firemen said a prayer before they fought a fire.
“What if the chief had been a Christian and ordered all the
firefighters to attend a Christian Bible reading?”
This isn’t a good parallel, because Christians understand that choosing salvation is a personal choice. A true Christian chief would never order all the firefighters to attend a Bible reading. It would be offered, with each individual choosing to accept the invitation or not.
Homosexuals, on the other hand, DEMAND you accept their perverted beliefs.