Skip to comments.
Noble (OK) officers on leave after shooting
Oklahoman Staff Writer ^
| Monday, August 6, 2007
| Jennifer Griswold
Posted on 08/06/2007 11:16:57 AM PDT by WestTexasWend
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: WestTexasWend
Hopefully the next stop is jail. Unbelievable recklessness to be trying to blow a snake out of a tree with a gun without knowing what else was in the line of fire.
To: stinkerpot65
Ah, yes. In Hillarys socialist village, every accident is a crime.In stinkerpot65's socialist village, no one is responsible for the consequences of their own stupid decisions.
If they, in their mindbendingly stupid negligence, kill someone - hey, stuff happens. No biggie.
22
posted on
08/06/2007 12:16:05 PM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: WestTexasWend
The grandfather said in another article that the cops did NOT help, but walked right by. So which is it?
23
posted on
08/06/2007 12:16:41 PM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
To: Vn_survivor_67-68
What happens if you bop a snake on the head with a nightstick?
To: Vn_survivor_67-68
Nobody feels worse about this than the cop. Im sure hell pay a big price beyond that,
I'll be sure to ping you to the follow-up article that will state that the DA has decided not to file charges.
To: Vn_survivor_67-68
“If he decides to blow his own brains out will you cheer? I wont.”
Let’s all hope that that is the outcome and he can save the taxpayer’s the price of a trial. I would throw a ticker-tape parade. But we all know that cops are above the law and that the DA will rule this as a justified shooting. POS.
26
posted on
08/06/2007 12:27:30 PM PDT
by
rednesss
(Fred Thompson - 2008)
To: WestTexasWend; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
"Daves confirmed two shots were fired at the snake to kill it."
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
27
posted on
08/06/2007 12:30:52 PM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: WestTexasWend
Prayers for the boy and family, consequences for the negligent.
28
posted on
08/06/2007 12:38:13 PM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Zimbabwe, leftist success story, the envy of Venezuela)
To: JenBrower
"Firearms Rule #1- Theres no Im sorry with a gun." From one Brower to another, truer words were never said.
29
posted on
08/06/2007 1:22:18 PM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
To: JenBrower
Amen, If I shot at my neighbor’s pit bull while it rushed me and a bullet hit one of the neighborhood kids, you can bet your sweet a$$ I’d be sitting in jail.
There is specific .22 round ammunition made for this, it’s actually called snake shot. We use it here in FL to kill water moccasins. You don’t need a 9mm or .45 ACP or what ever to kill a snake. Unfortunately this was overkill.
30
posted on
08/06/2007 1:53:29 PM PDT
by
TheKidster
(you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
To: Vn_survivor_67-68
Nobody feels worse about this than the cop.
I’d like to hear what the kid’s family would say to this statement.
31
posted on
08/06/2007 1:55:44 PM PDT
by
TheKidster
(you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
To: babygene
Criminal negligence? I wish you folks could SEE the terrain in question. I have. I live nearby. The growth is so thick, no one could possibly see as far away as where the boy was. A cop would not be able to fire a gun at all out here if he had to see that far away, and that’s a fact.
Firing into the air is another matter, but I suspect he will be punished for that mistake.
Now, if only the would also punish the foolish woman who called 911 over a snake....
And I do make a distinction between someone who is evil to the core and shoots children in drive-by shootings, and someone who only wants to do good, and causes harm. Fortunately, the law does too, even if people like you do not.
32
posted on
08/06/2007 1:56:10 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: dashing doofus
Very sad all around. It’s likely the negligent police officers feel just as bad as anyone would whose reckless action unintentionally kills an innocent person. I have some sympathy for them, but their assumed feelings of regret do not exempt them from the law — they should be subject to the same punishment that anyone else would face in this situation.
Prayers for the child’s family, and for everyone involved.
33
posted on
08/06/2007 2:02:02 PM PDT
by
ellery
(I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
To: ellery
I agree 100%.
IMO, The cops should face the same consequences for negligent use of a firearm as any other citizen.
And prayers for the dead child, his family, and yes, the police officers involved. A tragic mistake, but it was still negligent.
34
posted on
08/06/2007 2:18:39 PM PDT
by
dashing doofus
(Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
To: Vn_survivor_67-68
If he decides to blow his own brains out will you cheer? I wont.
I would. Stupid should hurt. Especially stupid by "trained professionals."
I would also cheer if the father of the boy decides to exact justice when the department and/or the courts decline.
The police should not be above the law. This was not an accident.
35
posted on
08/06/2007 2:30:06 PM PDT
by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: NVDave
I believe the police were dispatched because the municipality’s animal control officer position is vacant.
To: Filo
Trained professional? This is not the big city here. Three guys were out there, of the three, only one had more than a year’s experience. “Training” according to what I’m told consists of CLEET certification on their own dime, and “riding around awhile” with another officer. Wages...I’m hearing not more than minimum wage, with few benefits.
And NO ONE has said he’s “above the law.” This will be reviewed, perhaps more carefully than other cases because of the publicity, and he will likely face the consequences. These could include jail time, which for a police officer is more difficult than for others. It could also include fines and likely lawsuits—although I’m not sure you can get blood out of a turnip.
Aside from that, he’ll probably have nightmares for the rest of his life. If he has a family, no doubt they, too, will suffer for the rest of their lives too, especially if there’s jail time involved.
The last thing this man will be is “above the law.”
37
posted on
08/06/2007 3:24:26 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: MizSterious
The word “much” was left out of the comment about wages—should have been “not much more than minimum wage”—sorry about that.
38
posted on
08/06/2007 3:25:40 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: Filo
And please explain to me how this was not an accident? Did he stalk the young boy and track him down and shoot him? Or was it, as the article stated, a stray (or ricochet) bullet that took his life?
39
posted on
08/06/2007 3:27:56 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: MizSterious
And NO ONE has said hes above the law.
I did.
All cops are above the law. They are held to a completely different standard than citizens and they frequently get away with murder and other crimes exclusively because they are cops (i.e. civilians doing the exact same thing would be convicted, cops are not.)
And please explain to me how this was not an accident? Did he stalk the young boy and track him down and shoot him? Or was it, as the article stated, a stray (or ricochet) bullet that took his life?
If I get in my car drunk off my ass and plow into a family in a crosswalk would that be an accident?
If I run through a neighborhood shooting wildly, almost at random, and hit someone in a nearby home is that an accident?
Accidents are completely unexpected results from normal actions. I.e. a tire blows out or an iceberg comes out of the fog.
Shooting a gun has the expected result of putting a fast-moving projectile out of the muzzle. Unless the gun went off by itself due to some mechanical failure this incident was not an accident. It was the negligent discharge of a firearm.
The idiot cop should have known better, even with his minimal training, and should never have fired the gun. Having done so, however, he's lost all sympathy for himself or his family. At least from me.
40
posted on
08/06/2007 3:58:21 PM PDT
by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson