It was one of four I included in my post. You ignore the other three, so you can pick the weakest one and try to argue that.
Next time I'd suggest you pick his strongest denial.
When asked, "the suggestions from these people that you were talking to in this video that 9/11 was orchestrated by the government, you do not support that theory?" Paul answered, "Absolutely not." In other words, Al Qaeda did it.Done. Again.
The fact is he looks for support amongst truthers, conspiracy theorists, and assorted right wing radicals.
He disavowed them. Try again.
that's why his column is on their websites and in their publications.
His column is uncopyrighted. As you already know. Busted again.
He may not be a racist, but he's happy to dismiss racist comments with the excuse that gee, I didn't write them.
Since you bring it up, though his columns aren't copyrighted, he could solve that in a heartbeat, and he's apparently not disturbed to be promoted to readers and advertisers as a columnist in Willis Carto's antisemitic/Holocaust Denial rag.
An no, I don't think he's an antisemite or a racist.
But I think he's blind to it, and I think he's happy to get their votes.
That's not a quality I will accept in an elected official. A purely personal opinion.
You may see noting wrong with it, which is your personal opinion.
We'll see what the voters say.
And I know, Diebold will cheat him out of his victory, another of the nonsensical conspiratorial leftist talking points som of his supporters buy into.
He disavowed them? after how many appearances on the truther radio show?
Is he returning their money too (cause Lord knows that would leave a mark in his warchest if he does).
You know you all should have told the man that Jones is a truther.