[JTN]

Right, that may be how you would answer the question, but most people can answer it unequivocally.

He has answered it unequivocally. Remember, "Absolutely not"? I gave you four examples of Ron Paul denying any belief in "trutherism". If you want to pick his weakest denial so you can continue to try to claim that he's a truther, then hey, whatever helps you sleep at night.

And in the future, please preview before posting.

[SJackson]

I didn't pick his weakest denial, you did. And I admit it was weak. Next time I'd suggest you pick his strongest denial.

The fact is he looks for support amongst truthers, conspiracy theorists, and assorted right wing radicals. That's why he appears on their shows, that's why his column is on their websites and in their publications.

If that's not his intent, he's either too naive or too stupid to hold national office.

If his constituents want to reelect him, their choice, I'm told he brings home the pork by proposing it, then voting against it, knowing it will be passed.

A quality politician.