“Why don’t you try acknowledging that Malkin wasn’t lying, for starters?”
She, and now you are both lying. Ron Paul has stated over and over that he does not believe 911 was contrived (an inside job.) To suggest he believes so is totally dishonest.
Why don’t you try telling the truth?
“Her quotes were accurate.”
They were not. They were taken from the student truther’s version. The video link you offered as evidence contained no evidence as to the claims made. ZERO NADA ZILCH
“You didn’t like the message, so you accused the messenger.”
And the message has been refuted several times over. You are the one refusing to accept the truth.
” Then when it was proved she wasn’t lying, suddenly it doesn’t matter what the message was because he was just being polite to a truther. If what he said doesn’t matter, why did you accuse Malkin of lying about what he said?”
Because she did.
” Furthermore, this wasn’t merely a 9/11 truther showing up at one of his events. He attended an event hosted by the Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth. If he doesn’t want to be lumped with 9/11 Truthers, he might want to stop pandering to them for votes! “
Your biggest lie yet. Even Malkin has apologized for lying about that in the first place. Malkin:” I also stated that Paul appeared on campus with Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth. THIS IS INCORRECT. The incident I was referring to was an exchange that took place at a campaign house party, not during an on-campus joint appearance, as I mistakenly stated. I regret the errors and am forwarding this post to The Big Story producers so that they can air these corrections if they wish to do so.” Michelle Malkin
Here’s the truth. Since the SC debate where Paul accused illegal govt entanglements in foreign matters for 911, Malkin has attempted to link him to 911 truthers. She will do anything to make the link. Even lie. And she has lied. Sometimes she corrects her lies as she did above, and sometimes she insists upon believing her own lies.
Dr Paul is not an advocate for 911 truthers. That’s a fact.
Dr Paul was accosted by a student “scholar” truther for 911 at a campaign meeting. That’s a fact. He was not at a 911 truther meeting. That’s a fact. In that interview, Dr Paul never said 911 was an inside job. That’s a fact. Yes, he did say he believes that some elements of govt investigations are covered up. That’s a fact. (It’s also a fact that cover ups do occur. Anyone believing otherwise is a blind bleating sheep.)
If you are going to attempt to support the lies regarding Dr Paul from a stalkin Malkin blog, or her pundit post at FNC, then you and the others will be called on it. Your lies will not go unanswered. Her lies have been exposed. The video does not present what she (stalkin Malkin) suggests. At least she admitted he was not where she said he was. But that does not elevate her credibility one iota with me.
OK, fair enough. So he wasn’t at a Truther-sponsored event. Clearly the truther, and he isn’t the only one if you look at the Houston 9/11 Truther website, feels he is validated by Paul. Now are you telling me this truther changed the audio to mislead as to what Paul was saying in the interview?
OMG — would you PLEASE look at the bottom of her blog — the UPDATE section where she links to another blogger’s mp3 recording of Dr. Ron stating this nonsense on a truther’s radio show, in response to a truther’s question?
I am freakin dizzy from the spinning.
OMG — would you PLEASE look at the bottom of her blog — the UPDATE section where she links to another blogger’s mp3 recording of Dr. Ron stating this nonsense on a truther’s radio show, in response to a truther’s question?
I am freakin dizzy from the spinning.
OMG — would you PLEASE look at the bottom of her blog — the UPDATE section where she links to another blogger’s mp3 recording of Dr. Ron stating this nonsense on a truther’s radio show, in response to a truther’s question?
I am freakin dizzy from the spinning.