whatever .... but it wasn’t a reference to our common religion so much as to as our ability to believe the ‘unbelievable’ ... by no rational, objective means alone can a person believe in the Ressurection .. it is only by the Grace of and faith in God. If one is going to be strictly objective, the 19 fanatical, boxcutter packin’ Muslims scenario is more ‘believable.’
Absolutely not. There is multiple attestation by Mary Magdalene, apostles, disciples, and many, many more to whom Our Lord appeared before His Ascension. The same cannot be said of the 9/11 Commission report's official story.
There is no such thing as a word view which is based on "rational objective means alone" The great hat trick of modern empiricism is to tart up objectivism and call it "science" while all the dullards in the audience do wolf whistles.
The people bellowing the loudest for rational objective "proofs" (or evidences) are usually clueless to the fact that they are only repeating unprovable faith axioms. The whole gig is faith. It is just WHERE your faith rests.