Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
Or, ... a "negotiated" peace brokered by the US ... then a gradual withdraw to a status quo ante "China incident" ...

That is what Grew told Hull.

The Japanese held the opinion that the FDR administration wanted peace far too long.

102 posted on 08/05/2007 3:12:36 PM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: jamaksin
There's the "official history" that we have in our NEA reviewed text books, and then there's what FDR was really after.

No doubt the various naval force level agreements had served to remove the Brits from an effective position in the Pacific while elevating the Japanese and their American ally to an unassailable supremacy.

The Japanese had a firm position on the Eur-Asian landmass and definitely were positioned to defeat any Soviet incursion into our (and the Japanese) sphere of influence.

Then the Japanese did something very stupid ~ they invaded China ~ which ended up costing them a lot more than they gained, and that was just in the first few months.

103 posted on 08/05/2007 3:23:39 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson