Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76
This issue could really come back to bite Ritter. I wonder if Skaggs vetted this with Ritter’s staff before going public with it?
11 posted on 08/05/2007 2:29:59 PM PDT by colorado tanker (I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker
Ritter has not denied Skaggs’ comments that I have seen.

Therefore one can logically conclude that Ritter supports them ( even if Skagg’s did not vet them ). I doubt that Ritter can plead ignorance of the comments now. Plausible deniability is fading fast for Ritter.

My guess is that Ritter is using Skaggs’ comments as a test for public reaction. Ritter seems strong enough to say that he disagrees, if he did disagree.

Hopefully, this mess will explode in 2008.

12 posted on 08/05/2007 3:26:46 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson