Yep, if I believed in your logic, then I guess all of those speaking in tongue Christians should not be president.
I guess that leaves, Catholics, ah, wait maybe not.
Unitarians? Ahh, no.
Pentecostals? No, see above.
Southern Bapists? No they were created on the slavery issue.
Who is left? Ah yeah, Liberal Christians!
Only a Liberal Christian can be president because they are grounded!
[Yep, if I believed in your logic, then I guess all of those speaking in tongue Christians should not be president.]
I didn’t say they couldn’t be president, only that they should be open to questioning and able to explain how speaking in tongues would affect their presidency. I think someone giving whole speeches in tongues might be a bit disturbing, I guess you don’t.
Jesus was never Caesar. That is to say, Jesus’ religious beliefs actually disqualified him to be a ruler. So why should you expect Romney to be immune from scrutiny?
Not everyone deserves to be president, no matter how great their resume.
[I guess that leaves, Catholics, ah, wait maybe not.
Unitarians? Ahh, no.
Pentecostals? No, see above.
Southern Bapists? No they were created on the slavery issue.
Who is left? Ah yeah, Liberal Christians!
Only a Liberal Christian can be president because they are grounded!]
And by your criteria, Satanists, Wiccans, Kabbalists, Santerians, Scientologists, Rastafarans, et. al. just get a free pass. Some logic you have.
But certainly you’d expect Methodists to reject Hillary if she was a hypocrite about her religion? Or wouldn’t that count?