Ok, so a politician who is a Charasimatics should explain speaking in tongues or prophesying?
What nonsense! It should be only what his personal views are and anything related to governing.
LDS freepers, how about the “Life, Liberty, and Happiness” party?
[Ok, so a politician who is a Charasimatics should explain speaking in tongues or prophesying?
What nonsense! It should be only what his personal views are and anything related to governing.]
Are you saying that a President who was likely to start speaking in tongues in the middle of a heated state of the Union, or in times of duress, shouldn’t be questioned in depth about that?
It’s all fair game, or it’s not a Free Republic.