Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drawing Fire, Judith Giuliani Gives Her Side
The New York Times ^ | August 5, 2007 | ERIC KONIGSBERG

Posted on 08/04/2007 2:04:14 PM PDT by sitetest

It has not been an easy few months for Judith Giuliani. Her rollout to the public received rocky reviews from the political class, Republicans included. A series of negative articles about her shopping habits, marital past and supposedly testy relations with campaign staff followed. Her appearances alongside her husband, Rudolph W. Giuliani, grew suddenly scarce — and some analysts suggested that she keep it that way.

So it was perhaps no surprise that at a recent lunch in downtown Manhattan, Mrs. Giuliani offered this self-assessment: “When it comes to politics, I’m new to this.”

Over the course of a two-hour interview, Mrs. Giuliani, 53, talked for the first time about how she met Mr. Giuliani and about their first date. (He asked her out, she said.)

~ snip ~

“I’m sure that’s something that can get one into, you know — ” She did not finish the thought, but allowed her hands to flutter cautiously before going on. “But I try to remain me. And again, part of that is not doing anything more than I have to in terms of making myself in any way a distraction from what my husband is trying to do for America.”

Not becoming a distraction to her husband, a front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, appears to be an elusive goal.

~ snip ~

...she cuts a figure that Mr. Giuliani’s aides say will appeal to Republican voters. Husband and wife agree that Laura Bush is a model for Mrs. Giuliani.

But Judith carries some distinctly un-Laura baggage. Like her husband, she has been married twice before. They also had a secret affair for a year before Mr. Giuliani announced it to the world — and to his second wife, Donna Hanover — at a news conference.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adulterer; candidatespouse; cheatingspouse; cristynelategano; donnahanover; giuliani; judigiuliani; judith; judithnathan; presidentialelection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Liz
Keep in mind that Rooty markets himself as a "security expert" (which entails rigorous fact-checking).

A Maxwell Smart he is!

61 posted on 08/05/2007 6:08:47 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

LOL——maybe Rooty’s got a shoe phone?


62 posted on 08/05/2007 6:15:20 AM PDT by Liz (It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Liz

haaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Well, you “know his number”.....call him!


63 posted on 08/05/2007 6:16:07 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bukkdems

These are not “questions.” They are ludicrous liberal Talking Points, each followed by a question mark.


64 posted on 08/05/2007 6:18:57 AM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter

Dear Graymatter,

Yeah, I thought that line was kinda funny, too. Stupid, but funny.

My Republican wife finds Mrs. Giuliani III disgusting.

sitetest


65 posted on 08/05/2007 9:08:48 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

“These are not “questions.” They are ludicrous liberal Talking Points, each followed by a question mark.”

No, these are genuine concerns about unintended consequences you may not have considered. All you can reply with is scripted ad hominem attacks against the messenger whilst neglecting to address the questions.

If it came down to Guilani against Hillary or Obama, and you didn’t vote for Rudy, I would consider you treasonous.


66 posted on 08/05/2007 7:05:39 PM PDT by bukkdems (Saudi Arabis MUST export jihadis to have a stable society, because of polygamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: bukkdems
If it came down to Guilani against Hillary or Obama, and you didn’t vote for Rudy, I would consider you treasonous.

I'd sooner be shot at dawn than vote for a death-mongering fascist like Rudy.

67 posted on 08/06/2007 5:24:08 AM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bukkdems
WHO appoints the next justice to the SC IS an issue in this race. And Rudy is not up to the job. Rudy will never get the nomination, so your scenario does not fit.
68 posted on 08/06/2007 7:14:43 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson