Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

Frustrating that “the State” should have to pay for what the doctor did. I know this woman deserves something, but why force today’s taxpayers to face the punishment deserved by yesterday’s lawmakers?


3 posted on 08/04/2007 11:07:25 AM PDT by To Hell With Poverty (For evil to win, it is only necessary for Jimmy Carter to be considered a role model.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: To Hell With Poverty

Unfortunately, the people of the State of North Carolina left the burden of this misguided, brutal, and monstrous policy for future generations to bear. What a horrible, sickening story.


4 posted on 08/04/2007 11:14:33 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: To Hell With Poverty

Unfortunately, this was state-sanctioned and wide-spread in North Carolina and Virginia.

There were appeals all the way to the SCOTUS, and they ENDORSED it.

Black’s book “ America’s War Against the Weak” chronicles it.

Wagglebee, I think I am missing part of the title. Do you know it?


7 posted on 08/04/2007 11:30:21 AM PDT by fetal heart beats by 21st day (Defending human life is not a federalist issue-it is the business of all humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: To Hell With Poverty
Frustrating that “the State” should have to pay for what the doctor did. I know this woman deserves something, but why force today’s taxpayers to face the punishment deserved by yesterday’s lawmakers?

You make a fair point. I simply don't know what the most just solution might be.

As you point out, the victim mentioned above does deserve some compensation--although monetary damages seem hugely inadequate. To penalize today's taxpayers for the misdeeds of yesteryear's lawmakers, however, does not seem quite like an equitable solution. In fact, it is reminiscent of "affirmative action" programs that punish college applicants, prospective employees, or anyone else because of the misdeeds of others in past generations.

However, since it would be impossible to have this woman (or other victims of eugenics) "made whole," in the words of one North Carolina lawmaker, by simply excoriating past lawmakers, this seems like a non-solution.

But that still does not prove that it is okay to penalize those who are innocent of any wrongdoing in this case.

It is a serious conundrum. I just don't know what sort of action would most nearly satisfy the interests of justice.

9 posted on 08/04/2007 11:34:07 AM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: To Hell With Poverty
Because the states were up to their eyeballs in the sterilization movement, beginning in the 1920s and extending into the early 1970s. Virginia and its Lynchburg institute was notorious, and in fact, a couple of my relatives were picked-up off the road, sent to Lynchburg, and sterilized in the 1930s because they were poor, not stupid, but poor.

If the North Carolina was involved in this woman's sterilization, then it ought to be held accountable, even though it happened over 30 years ago.

Here're more details on state-sponsored sterilizations:

http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/html/eugenics/essay8text.html

33 posted on 08/04/2007 1:19:08 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson