Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNBC's Cramer: Wake Up, Bernanke !
CNBC ^ | 8/3/2007 | Staff

Posted on 08/04/2007 10:36:23 AM PDT by ex-Texan

Jim Cramer today angrily called on Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke to lower interest rates, saying he "has no idea how bad it is out there" in the nation's credit markets.

In his "Stop Trading" segment on Street Signs today, Cramer said the nation's central bank is "asleep" and should immediately "relieve the pressure" on financial firms and the nation's home owners who are facing big increases in their mortgage payments as 'teaser' rates expire. Many thousands will "lose their homes," he warned. "This is not the time to be complacent."

About an hour later, he made a return appearance on CNBC's Closing Bell to soften his initial comments, making it clear that he is not recommending investors sell stocks. He predicted a big rebound for the major stock market averages if the Fed does indeed lower rates, and said he was upset by Bear Stearn's Bear Stearns Co Inc [BSC] "complaining" during a conference call earlier in the afternoon. "I don't want to scare anybody," he added. "The Fed can make this whole problem go away" by lowering interest rates.

Standard & Poor's changed its rating outlook on the firm to negative from stable this morning.

NOTE: There is a MUST SEE Video at the primary link. Why? Jim Cramer losses it on the air.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bernanke; cnbc; govwatch; grapesofwrath; greedwallstreet; housing; jimcramer; poorme; realestate; stockmarkets; theskyisfalling; tomjoad; vulturegram; woeisus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: oldbill

I agree that the sub-prime mess (and especially the “no-doc” and “stated income” type of loans) have a high correlation with areas of illegal immigration.

But that isn’t a complete explanation of who took out these loans. Plenty of US citizens were lining up to take the ultra-low teaser rate mortgages with little to no documentation necessary.

In 2005 and 2006, the mortgage industry was giving money away. By the truckload.

I’m a firm believer that the bankers who wrote loans to bad borrowers should get what they deserve: defaults and foreclosures. That’ll teach them to not write loans to people without documentation, either legal or financial.


61 posted on 08/05/2007 9:38:21 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

I would argue that the funds rate has basically been decoupled from the yield curve in this latest cycle. There’s far too much liquidity from non-Fed sources sloshing around the world.

Consider this: please look at a graph of 10-year Treasury rates over the last eight weeks. Look at how, as this sub-prime/hedge fund/margin call mess has exploded in the markets, the 10-year T has gone from about 5.25% down to under 4.8%.

Right there is a nice indication, IMO, of how much money is sloshing around the markets, completely beyond the control of the Fed. The Fed’s funds rate is still right where it was eight weeks ago, but the long end of the curve is suddenly going down, down, down as these funds “flee to quality” and cause a nearly 50-bp move in the 10-year rate.

The need for the Fed to stand pat actually has less to do with the actual rate (because, really, we could debate what the funds rate should be one way or the other until cows jump over the moon) and much more to do with investor confidence. I argue that if the Fed were to start playing with rates at all just now, investors in US debt markets (esp. international investors, who have been taking a bath on the declining value of the US dollar) would flee, because they would think that the Fed sees the recent market gyrations as being “so serious that the Fed needs to step in.”

One of the big problems here is that no one has a firm grip on just what level of exposure is out there in these CDO’s/CDO-squareds. If the Fed gives the debt markets any reason at all to think that the Fed is worried about just how far the “toxic waste” has spread, then we’re gonna see things get real ugly.

There’s a big psych component in the recent market actions, and that’s what I’m addressing.


62 posted on 08/05/2007 9:50:56 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Cramer? More coffee!


63 posted on 08/05/2007 9:52:43 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: darth
I’m an expert. Not only do I have an M.A. in Econ, but I have lost my A** in stocks, commodities, and real estate (on separate occasions, thank G-d).

How many asses do you have?

64 posted on 08/05/2007 9:56:20 AM PDT by Clam Digger (Hey Bill O'Reilly, you suck! How's that for pithy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

The market is to low for th long term good of th economy.


65 posted on 08/05/2007 1:51:51 PM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Clam Digger

It grew back each time. Seriously, I made money sometimes and usually lost it when I began to think I was omniscient. I doubled my capital in commodities in three months; the next year I got arrogant and lost it all. Doubled my money in California real estate...re-leveraged and lost all of it plus $500K during the next downturn. Five years ago I bought a company for $450K and ended up in Chapter 7. Two years ago I bought another company in the same industry for ZERO dollars and am running it at a profit. Arrogance and overconfidence are my weak points. However, that same confidence is what makes me an entrepreneur.


66 posted on 08/05/2007 5:13:42 PM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
But nearly 1/25 people in California have real estate licenses.

That's pretty funny.

67 posted on 08/05/2007 5:20:35 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Trails of troubles, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

I have one more mortgage payment and my house is paid for!
I feel sorry for a lot of my friends with interest-only loans.


68 posted on 08/05/2007 5:37:16 PM PDT by Riptides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
He's not Erin Burnett... now the MSM is worried about economic catastrophe? ROFL! Go look in the mirror, Jim Cramer!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

69 posted on 08/05/2007 5:39:23 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
The market is to low for th long term good of th economy.

You're arrogant, you want to maximize economic damage, and you think you are smarter than the markets. All you need is a PhD in economics and you could lead the Federal Reserve.

70 posted on 08/05/2007 6:15:59 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
the nation's central bank is "asleep" and should immediately "relieve the pressure" on financial firms and the nation's home owners who are facing big increases in their mortgage payments as 'teaser' rates expire.

Sorry, but just because some home buyers were stupid, is no reason to tinker with interest rates with the potential of over heating the economy causing inflation. Now if the economic indicators call for a reduction, then by all means...

71 posted on 08/05/2007 6:27:22 PM PDT by Go Gordon (The short fortune teller who escaped from prison was a small medium at large.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

And you want to lower rates to keep your gravy train running despite the long term damage to this country’s economy. Banks made tons of loans to people who had no earthly business so much as being loaned a pen to fill out the app. Banks stood to reep the profits, no let them suffer the losses. It is time for sanity to return to this and part of that is letting the correction happen, the longer we try to stop it with more cheap money the worse it will be.


72 posted on 08/06/2007 3:02:49 AM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
And you want to lower rates to keep your gravy train running despite the long term damage to this country’s economy.

Now you're contradicting yourself. You said the correction is inevitable and I agree at this point. Lowering rates won't change that, but it will limit damage to the rest of the economy and reduce unnecessary human suffering.

73 posted on 08/06/2007 3:57:52 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon
Sorry, but just because some home buyers were stupid, is no reason to tinker with interest rates with the potential of over heating the economy causing inflation. Now if the economic indicators call for a reduction, then by all means...

Sorry, but you're the idiot. The Federal Reserve has already tinkered with interest rates and held them too high for well over a year.

BTW, there is no such thing as economic overheating that causes inflation. It's an excuse the Fed uses to manipulate the economy.

74 posted on 08/06/2007 4:08:25 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: darth
However, that same confidence is what makes me an entrepreneur.

My dad had his own business, I saw what it took out of him, i don't want that. More power to you!

75 posted on 08/06/2007 4:10:33 AM PDT by Clam Digger (Hey Bill O'Reilly, you suck! How's that for pithy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
I would argue that the funds rate has basically been decoupled from the yield curve in this latest cycle.

The funds rate has still had tremendous influence on the short end of the curve.

Consider this: please look at a graph of 10-year Treasury rates over the last eight weeks. Look at how, as this sub-prime/hedge fund/margin call mess has exploded in the markets, the 10-year T has gone from about 5.25% down to under 4.8%.

I watch the 10 year almost everyday. Money has gone into government bonds the past few weeks as a safe haven. The money has come from the sales of stocks and lower quality bonds, not money sloshing around. The 10 year bond is more attractive because it is more influenced by the now greater likelihood of a rate cut.

The need for the Fed to stand pat actually has less to do with the actual rate (because, really, we could debate what the funds rate should be one way or the other until cows jump over the moon) and much more to do with investor confidence. I argue that if the Fed were to start playing with rates at all just now, investors in US debt markets (esp. international investors, who have been taking a bath on the declining value of the US dollar) would flee, because they would think that the Fed sees the recent market gyrations as being “so serious that the Fed needs to step in.”

What you're talking about is the psychology of the ignorant, speculative, and dramatic press. Real investors with real money would love to have rates determined by the market rather than an arrogant PhD who makes the same salary regardless of his performance, and will never be held accountable for his mistakes.

76 posted on 08/06/2007 5:04:10 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

No lower rates will only make it worse. Inflation is on the rise adn has to be checked, that is one of the main reasons I think we need at least a 1/2 point increased.


77 posted on 08/06/2007 5:08:15 AM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
No lower rates will only make it worse. Inflation is on the rise adn has to be checked, that is one of the main reasons I think we need at least a 1/2 point increased.

The only way to eliminate inflation is to cut back government spending, and to encourage economic growth through the supply side. The Federal Reserve's credit cycle method, based on the incorrect theory that economic growth and full employment cause inflation, doesn't work. It still allows prices to double every 20 to 25 years.

The real reason you want the Fed to hike rates more is to increase human suffering so that you may benefit.

78 posted on 08/06/2007 5:59:06 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

No want rates up to stop inflation return the economy to an even keel befor eit gets even worse.


79 posted on 08/06/2007 6:01:05 AM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
No, they will stop buying US Treasuries

That's a popular notion and might even be right.

On the other hand: A decent sized rate cut might already be priced in to the currency markets.

80 posted on 08/06/2007 6:04:05 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Dems '08 choices are a Manly woman, a Womanly man, or an naive Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson