Posted on 08/03/2007 11:37:35 PM PDT by neverdem
The former vice president’s new book is itself an assault on reason.
The Assault on Reason, by Al Gore (Penguin Press, 320 pp., $25.95)
The most surprising thing about The Assault on Reason, Al Gore’s current bestseller, is that for a little while it actually makes some sense. The first few dozen pages, while hyperpartisan, mainly excoriate a dumbed-down, trivia-and-celebrity-obsessed culture, and in the age of Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan who could disagree?
But Al Gore is like one of those guys at a party with whom, once you get a few drinks in him, you never know what’s coming. He’s liable to strip to his underwear or start spewing expletives or waddle over with an outstretched hand and ingratiating smile and suddenly go for your ear like Mike Tyson. For just beneath that aging prep-boy facade, there’s an unmistakable anger and bitterness; where Bill Clinton has always seemed too comfortable in his skin, Gore has often seemed inclined to burst out of his, like some demented political version of the Incredible Hulk.
For me, the defining Al Gore story is the one that Ward Connerly, the longtime crusader against racial preferences, tells in his autobiography Creating Equal. Having been invited to the Clinton White House as part of a group of largely black conservatives to counter criticism that Clinton’s vaunted Initiative on Race was getting input from only one side, Connerly held forth on the great damage that he believed affirmative action and other well-intended policies had done to the ideal of a colorblind America. Clinton, he says, listened attentively, even sympathetically, and later threw his arm around him in brotherly solidarity. But Gore visibly seethed—and afterward, when Connerly offered his hand, he seized it in a vicelike grip and, smiling coldly, kept squeezing, until there was no doubt in Connerly’s mind that he was trying to hurt him.
The Assault on Reason is like that. Yes, it’s logically inconsistent and self-serving and unbelievably sanctimonious, but there’s a lot of that going around. What ultimately makes the book so disturbing is that something pretending to be a brief for reason and comity is so unbelievably small and mean-spirited. It is less an argument than an extended tantrum. Reading it is often like being locked in a room with a madman.
Even more than most partisan commentators today (and of course there are more than a few on the right), Gore is blind to how recklessly he abuses facts and applies double standards, not to mention to his own viciousness. He continually rails, for instance, against those who use “fear” and “simplistic nostrums disguised as solutions” to sway an inattentive and emotionally malleable public, causing it to “overreact to illusory threats and underreact to real threats”—this from the man behind the global-warming frenzy, who consistently downplays the menace of international terrorism.
He describes his conservative adversaries as nothing less than monsters, who hold their views not out of genuine conviction about what’s good for the country but because they are wholly indifferent to the general good. Moreover, he piously adds, the Right “often manifests a complete lack of empathy toward other Americans whom it identifies as its ideological enemies.” Yet a little further on, he’s applauding the special-interest groups on the left as “advocates of a broad and effuse public interest who rely mainly on the force of argument and the rule of reasoning,” regretting only that they lack “access to the same supplies of concentrated wealth” as those on the right. He bemoans “hatred as entertainment,” reserving special venom for the “Limbaugh-Hannity-Drudge Axis,” yet cites the likes of Paul Krugman and Joseph Wilson as decent and fair-minded commentators.
Most bizarre of all, he insists—indeed, this is his main point—that “the public sphere is simply no longer as open to the vigorous and free exchange of ideas from individuals as it was when America was founded” (this on page 26), and then manages not to discuss the Internet for another 230 pages. When he finally does, he blithely contradicts almost all of the alarmist claptrap that came earlier, proclaiming that “broadband interconnection is supporting decentralized processes that reinvigorate democracy.”
That The Assault on Reason has sold well is surely because Al Gore is now a name brand with whom a certain stripe of leftist is eager to identify. One is reminded of a recent marketing survey of Prius owners, which revealed that as many as 50 percent of those buying the Toyota hybrid do so because, unlike the Honda and Ford hybrids (which can be mistaken for regular Civics and Escapes), the Prius is immediately identifiable as a badge of virtue. Rest assured that this book, a similar emblem, will spend a lot more time on Hamptons coffee tables than at the beach.
There were no confuzzled seniors, but there was a sh#tload of people who voted for the fool and would be ready to do so again in a heartbeat. That’s what’s frightening.
bttt for one excellent article
Rumor hath it that when BJ went into sex-perjury, Tipper advised Al to resign. Her theory: if BJ wouldn't resign, Al should, to stake his claim on the moral high ground. However, Tipper (who was mighty attractive to BJ) had reckoned without BJ's personal charm. He actually talked Al into staying aboard. And supporting him 100%!
After BJ accomplished that mission, he dropped Al like the proverbial potato. BJ continually marginalized Al in favor of Hillary. That had to hurt.
BTW, Tipper and Hillary were and probably still are bitter enemies.
Had Al taken Tipper's advice and resigned, I think he could have been elected president for life.
BTW, the fact that 49%+ of the electorate thought this nutjob should be president, when even a cursory look at him in a photograph shows obvious signs of derangement, does not augur well for the future of the republic.
And, I actually think he'll run again!
In retrospect it was a little cuban boy that determined the outcome of the 2000 election. That ****ed off the FL cuban community and was the edge that gave GWB those electoral votes. If gore had stood up to bogus bill HE would have won cuban hearts = white house berth. But he’s a KLUTZ, what more can one say, and certainly not presidential material.
But I’m starting to wonder about GWB too, he’s been screwing up a lot lately : totally wrong on immigration : his JOB description is to protect from FOREIGN INVASIONS. Now it’s this sea treaty wherein he gives the UN sovereignty over all the world’s oceans! He’s blithely dancing on the edge of the impeachment pit. All it will take is a few angry republicans to push him over that edge.
Great piece by Harry Stein. I still read his book “How I Joined the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy...and Found Inner Peace” from time to time.
A great story of a former NYC lib turned reasonable.
What is Gore talking about? Does he realize how many hundreds of millions of dolalrs the left raised, mostly through 527's, in the 2004 election?
Thank you for your review her. I just read Tom DeLay's book, and as partisan as DeLay is, he admits many faults without hesitation.
That’s because Tom DeLay is (1) intellectually honest and (2) confident that he’s right on the issues, the occasional error notwithstanding. I doubt that Gore could look in the mirror and make the same claims.
I think the Algore still hasn't figured out that the Clinton's shafted him.
And it does go to show that a cartel of sorts runs this country.
Algore has become the Pat Buchanan of the left.
He has become a self-sustaining cottage industry, manufacturing books for his market.
It is perhaps significant that Algore enjoys a wider market on the left than Pat does on the right.
Not to mention that, occasionally, Pat makes a lot of sense...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.