ping
Munley's decision is a burlesque of law. He inverts meanings ( how is it that a law that mimics or conforms to a federal law supercedes it? ); he fabricates outcome where necessary ( his ludicrous assertion that unnamed illegals have standing - do they even exist? ); he asserts insane conclusions ( Hazelton violates Art. 12 prohibitions against compacts with a foreign state? Huh? ); etc etc, ad nauseum.
It won't stand. Even with the nutcases we have in black robes, this one won't stand. It's the work of one smug, arrogant, ideological freak.