Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fitzcarraldo

If we cannot support humans on the moon,
it seems less likely to support humans on Mars.


18 posted on 08/03/2007 7:10:52 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Diogenesis
If we cannot support humans on the moon, it seems less likely to support humans on Mars.

Water on the Moon remains unconfirmed. (It could be confirmed with a relatively inexpensive unmanned landing mission to the lunar poles.) There is little or no carbon dioxide there, either, and there is no other source of carbon. You need to use rockets to brake to a landing on the Moon, hence additional fuel.

For a relatively small addition in escape energy, you can get to Mars, brake to a landing using its atmosphere, and have all the chemical components at hand to begin industrial operations - from what we know already.

21 posted on 08/03/2007 7:25:47 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo (Skip the Moon, go for Mars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson