Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate OKs wider kids' health program
AP on Yahoo ^ | 8/2/07 | Julie Hirschfeld Davis - ap

Posted on 08/02/2007 9:57:41 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - The Senate passed legislation Thursday to add 3 million lower-income children to a popular health insurance program in bipartisan defiance of President Bush's threatened veto.

The 68-31 vote, one day after the House passed a more ambitious and expensive version over bitter Republican opposition, handed Democrats a solid achievement to trumpet as they leave Washington for a summer break.

It also gave Democrats, who secured a veto-proof margin, a chance to draw a stark distinction between their priorities and Bush's on an issue that resonates with voters.

"For the life of me, I can't understand why the president would want to veto this legislation," said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the Finance Committee chairman. "It's moderate, it's bipartisan, it helps low-income kids. ... It's just the right thing to do for the country."

Bush has proposed spending $5 billion to extend the State Children's Health Insurance Program. He says the Senate's $35 billion expansion would balloon the decade-old program beyond its original mission of covering working poor children and would move more people toward government-run health care.

The program expires Sept. 30.

The Senate measure now must be reconciled with the House-passed $50 billion expansion, which was paid for partly by cutting government payments to Medicare health maintenance organizations.

Both bills include hefty tax increases on tobacco products to pay for the spending increase.

Architects of the legislation "have seized the reauthorization of SCHIP as a license to raise taxes, increase spending and take a giant leap forward into the land of government-run health care," said Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., the minority leader.

He was one of 31 Republicans to oppose the measure, while 18 Republicans joined 48 Democrats and two independents to support it.

The health program is designed to subsidize the cost of insurance for children whose families earn too much to participate in Medicaid, but not enough to afford private health insurance.

Through federal waivers, the program has expanded in many states to include middle-income children and adults. That has led Republicans to argue that it has become a backdoor way to extend government-provided health care to an increasing number of people.

National polls show overwhelming majorities of voters support expanding the children's health program and are more likely to support candidates who back it.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; healthprogram; itsforthechildren; kids; schip; senate; wider
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: NormsRevenge

Socialism at its best, on display in the halls of OUR congress, and with the support of so-called Republican, small-government types. This bill, if I understand it correctly, is to be funded in part by a $1.00-per-pack cigarette tax. Wait until the great unwashed amongst the entitled get a whopping dose of that brand of income distribution. There’ll be Hell to pay unless Dubya has the nads to veto this POS legislation.


21 posted on 08/02/2007 11:09:08 PM PDT by thelastvirgil (Lest ye put all your faith in the government to provide for you, check their track record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hcd707

Thanks!


22 posted on 08/02/2007 11:31:37 PM PDT by torchthemummy (Democrat's Support Of The Military: "Invincible In Peace-Invisible In War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I calculate already the government spends 1 trillion on healthcare. Medicare, Medicaid, VA benefits, government employee and retiree and family health care insurance... and now programs like this for kids.. I might even be a little low.

Well that is 3300$ per capita we spend. France spends about that, but they have free universal health care for all. So why do we have to pay for that much publicly.. then pay that much again privately.


23 posted on 08/02/2007 11:38:58 PM PDT by ran20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It also gave Democrats, who secured a veto-proof margin, a chance to draw a stark distinction between their priorities and Bush's on an issue that resonates with voters.

Veto-proof in the Senate, but not in the House.

24 posted on 08/02/2007 11:47:45 PM PDT by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson