Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zendari
You gotta love these liberal 'rats... They can argue with each other, and both be wrong.

Obama said "...he would not use nuclear weapons in any circumstance to fight terrorism..."

That is just stupid. It has been long standing policy to fight WMD with WMD - ie. respond in kind, MAD, etc. Saying you won't is inviting devastating attack with little potential consequence for the attacker. The US won't use chemical or biologics, so our retaliation to a WMD strike has to be nuclear. Saying you won't under any circumstances is criminally idiotic.

But then Clinton gets stupid too, and comes up with: "Presidents should be very careful at all times in discussing the use or non-use of nuclear weapons. ... I don't believe that any president should make any blanket statements with respect to the use or non-use of nuclear weapons,"

Well, don't you sound presidential...not! Another long standing policy of the US is the "No first use" principle in regards to nuclear weapons. Basically a pledge to the then USSR that we would not strike first. Very much a blanket statement.

These 'rats... Do they have any education or appreciation for history, strategy (other than campaign/smear), or just plain common sense?

32 posted on 08/02/2007 7:04:02 PM PDT by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CodeMasterPhilzar

Obama! Sounds like a pancake batter.


33 posted on 08/02/2007 7:20:19 PM PDT by baiamonte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson