Skip to comments.
OBAMA: NO NUKES. (Would not use nuclear weapons 'in any circumstance')
Drudge ^
| 8/2/2007
Posted on 08/02/2007 9:39:23 AM PDT by Uncledave
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-171 next last
To: All
I was hoping that he’d be able to draw some of the air out of Mrs clinton’s campaign but it looks like that’s not going to happen.
I think his campaign is filled with clinton spies.
To: JRjr
Peter Principle in action!
Classic, and on display for the whole world.
102
posted on
08/02/2007 10:09:52 AM PDT
by
mutley
To: JZelle
Obama might be the anti-christ.No way. The antichrist will be intelligent.
This guy is dumber than they said Dan Quayle was.
103
posted on
08/02/2007 10:10:00 AM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(Dems '08 choices are a Manly woman, a Womanly man, or an naive Senator)
To: domenad
But hes so articulate! No wait, scratch that... Clean too! oh wait...nevermind.
104
posted on
08/02/2007 10:10:09 AM PDT
by
pgkdan
(Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
To: Uncledave
One after another, Barak Hussein is really digging a hole. I know, I'll contact his campaign HQ and sell him some clues...nah.
5.56mm
105
posted on
08/02/2007 10:10:26 AM PDT
by
M Kehoe
To: Uncledave
Watch Hillary surge in the polls. Obama is officially RADIOACTIVE!
106
posted on
08/02/2007 10:10:32 AM PDT
by
toddlintown
(Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: newnhdad
![](http://www.gamertagpics.com/users/r/Re/Renegade04/carl.gif)
Ha-ha...or, as DUmmies would say: "Osamma Bamma, your (sic) a moran (sic)!"
107
posted on
08/02/2007 10:11:03 AM PDT
by
meandog
(Bush's name now synonymous with every bad word known.)
To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
Makes sense. A VP does not make the decision.
To: Uncledave
The Illinois senator warned Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf earlier this week that he would use U.S. military force in Pakistan even with Musharrafs permission if necessary to root out terrorists. Gawd, the AP insinuates here that BHO actually has the authority to do so.
109
posted on
08/02/2007 10:11:13 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Uncledave
When’s the flip-flopping begin?
110
posted on
08/02/2007 10:11:36 AM PDT
by
toddlintown
(Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: null and void
Me too. My dad's first stop was Okinawa, next stop Japan...So was my uncle.
111
posted on
08/02/2007 10:13:03 AM PDT
by
TYVets
(God so loved the world he didn't send a committee)
To: aShepard
“Unfortunately, as this dork implodes, hell drive more kook losers to Hitlery, making her more invincible!”
Finally, a voice of reason, thank you. As Conservatives, we should be supporting Osbama. He’ll be MUCH easier to beat than the beast.
112
posted on
08/02/2007 10:14:18 AM PDT
by
panaxanax
(Ronald Reagan would vote for Duncan Hunter!)
To: Uncledave
I’d hate to see nukes used by anyone. But if it has to be, it has to be. During WWII, it is said that we saved over 500,000 of our boys lives by dropping nukes on Japan. If we get hit here in this country by nukes, the door is wide open and I would totally support this country responding in like. Nobody should be President that can’t use anything we have to protect this country.
113
posted on
08/02/2007 10:15:12 AM PDT
by
RC2
To: Uncledave
She's got the dem nomination sown up anyway. Definitely. All the others are unqualifed or moonbats. All running for either the Veep slot or a position high in the Cabinet- State or Defense.
114
posted on
08/02/2007 10:15:47 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: panaxanax
Finally, a voice of reason, thank you. As Conservatives, we should be supporting Osbama. Hell be MUCH easier to beat than the beast.
Yes, but I think this was inevitable.
115
posted on
08/02/2007 10:16:02 AM PDT
by
mutley
To: Miss Didi
Clinton would use them, but only if we ran out of cruise missiles whilst bombing camel watering holes.
116
posted on
08/02/2007 10:18:43 AM PDT
by
CJ Wolf
To: Tex Pete
Bush read 100 books last year... how many did osama read? Comics do not count.
LLS
117
posted on
08/02/2007 10:19:08 AM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: JZelle
Obama might be the anti-christ.
I've been saying that for a while now.
To: Uncledave
NO NUKES! NO NUKES!
119
posted on
08/02/2007 10:19:32 AM PDT
by
uglybiker
(relaxing in a luxuriant cloud of quality, aromatic, pre-owned tobacco essence)
To: ClearCase_guy
“It almost looks likes heâs trying to disqualify himself. His recent statements vis a vis foreign policy issues just couldnât be worse. Maybe heâs taking himself out so that he can be more clearly positioned as VP.”
I believe he is nuking that option as well. With the statements he has made this week we will bury him in any debate including if he was on the ticket with the Beast in the General. He is toast, wrap him in the Times he sleeps with the fish.
120
posted on
08/02/2007 10:19:44 AM PDT
by
mmanager
(Fred instead of Purebred, Crossbred and the Hothead)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-171 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson