Skip to comments.
Reporter Apologizes for Michael Vick Rape Comment
FoxNews.com ^
| August 1, 2007
Posted on 08/02/2007 4:52:39 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: Homer1
Somewhere, our forefathers are weeping.No they're not. There have always been things that shouldn't be spoken in public. They are true, but none the less should not be said publically. Freedom of speech doesn't mean you ignore the rules of polite society.
21
posted on
08/02/2007 5:44:35 AM PDT
by
McGavin999
("Hard is not Hopeless" General Petraeus)
To: mutley
Like if he used his rape stand?
22
posted on
08/02/2007 5:45:43 AM PDT
by
JZelle
To: JZelle
Like if he used his rape stand?
LOL!
23
posted on
08/02/2007 5:49:26 AM PDT
by
mutley
To: rightwingintelligentsia
He apologizes for saying the TRUTH????
24
posted on
08/02/2007 5:57:41 AM PDT
by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
"Michael Vick would have been "better off raping a woman" than being charged with dogfighting"Not if Michael Vick played lacrosse for Duke.
To: JZelle
And he deserves to get time. Hard time and lots of it. And quickly. Stupid vicious remark on the part of this sports reporter, but this type of comment comes roaring out every time there is an animal cruelty case. The anti-abortion people and the feminazis whirl into the center of things and start flogging their causes, and they have very little sympathy for what is going on here: abuse of animals for money and fun. They believe their causes are somehow on a higher plane: they are not.
26
posted on
08/02/2007 6:10:32 AM PDT
by
twonie
(Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
To: hophead
The victims in the Vick case were innocents. OJ’s victims were not. I am not stating here that they deserved to die and OJ should have killed them, but they were in no way innocents.
27
posted on
08/02/2007 6:12:49 AM PDT
by
twonie
(Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
To: McGavin999
They are true, but none the less should not be said publically. Freedom of speech doesn't mean you ignore the rules of polite society. So it's impolite to point out injustice?
28
posted on
08/02/2007 6:14:04 AM PDT
by
Sloth
(The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Really stupid comment. But, I agree with it.
Legit charge or not...millions would say "She's just trying to hit the lawsuit lottery." "She's a gold-digger" "She knew what she was getting into." etc. He'd still be playing right now, and if acquitted, he'd go back to the Falcons just like nothing happened.
Now, killing puppies, that's a WHOLE 'nother story. No good way to spin that one.
29
posted on
08/02/2007 6:19:24 AM PDT
by
wbill
To: mutley
Monumental dimwit moment....and a PC police moment, as well. We've seen a series of high-profile celebrities 'beat' rape charges & settle rape-related civil suits.
Here we're looking at a federal charge, with insider witnesses. I also believe that it will come to light that they have tape of a Vick wiretap proving his involvement beyond a shadow... though I admit it's just a guess at this point.
Second prediction: Vick has played his last down in the NFL.
30
posted on
08/02/2007 6:21:16 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
(Climate is what you plan for, weather is what you get.)
To: KoRn
Yes, you’re right. But the truth, apparently, is no protection from the PC police.
31
posted on
08/02/2007 6:24:06 AM PDT
by
swain_forkbeard
(Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
To: JZelle
Its like what Newt said about Detroit.
Sorry, I guess I missed it. What did Newt say about Detroit?
32
posted on
08/02/2007 6:24:50 AM PDT
by
no dems
(Dear God, how long are you going to let Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd and John Conyers live?)
To: KoRn
Exactly. The outrage over cruelty to animals drowns out man’s inhumanity to man.
33
posted on
08/02/2007 6:27:27 AM PDT
by
stevio
((NRA))
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I wonder if the reporter would have gotten into as much hot water had he said:
"Michael Vick would have been better off murdering two people as did O.J. Simpson....."
34
posted on
08/02/2007 6:30:31 AM PDT
by
no dems
(Dear God, how long are you going to let Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd and John Conyers live?)
To: Always Right
He has a point. Kolbe got over the rape charge, but this dog fighting charge is gonna doom Vick. Of course, the merits of the rape charge were always much more in question than these charges against Vick, but still if it was 'just' rape, Vick would stand a better chance at coming back. I don't understand it, but that is the truth. It's because, in the hierarchy of victimhood that is our society today; animals trump people.
To: no dems
36
posted on
08/02/2007 6:33:38 AM PDT
by
JZelle
To: twonie
How were OJ’s victims not innocents?
37
posted on
08/02/2007 6:34:54 AM PDT
by
JZelle
To: twonie
I’m sorry but I have to say pedophilia is much worse than animal abuse.
38
posted on
08/02/2007 6:36:16 AM PDT
by
JZelle
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Personally, I dont find the guy’s statement offensive at all. I understand what he was trying to do: dramatize just how much Americans love dogs. He wasn’t trying to diss women.
Of course you can’t tell that to the 24/7 grievance mongers.
39
posted on
08/02/2007 6:36:17 AM PDT
by
freespirited
(Thank you for not lying about Republicans.)
To: JZelle
I disagree they are both equally bad dog killer or rapist
40
posted on
08/02/2007 6:40:09 AM PDT
by
restornu
(Romney keeps his eyes on the mission, and not on those who attacks his campaign!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson