To: fishhound
Coelacanths used to be some of the best empirical evidence for evolution - until one turned up in a fish market.
2 posted on
08/01/2007 7:45:56 PM PDT by
PAR35
To: PAR35
They thought the entire order coelacanth was extinct, this would be the operating hypothesis (awaiting new evidence)considering that nobody had ever seen or described the extant species, or seen any fossil evidence that the order had survived the Cretaceous. What other hypothesis should have been considered?
To: PAR35
As I recall, an alleged missing link fish that crawled onto land with nubby fins. Nice theory, but it turns out they can't crawl.
9 posted on
08/01/2007 7:59:12 PM PDT by
ChessExpert
(Mohamed was not a moderate Muslim)
To: PAR35
"Hey, Joe, I just caught a coelacanth."
"A coelacanth, huh? Aren't they extinct?"
"They are now."
Incidentally, a coelacanth in a fish market no more falsifies evolution than does ... well, these things. I myself have seen both fossilized and living examples of dragonflies in the wild; it never occurred to me that I had disproved evolution! (Unfortunately, mom threw away my magnificent dragonfly fossil when I was about 10, ending my dreams of being a paleontologist. Maybe some future archaeologist investigating a trash heap will discover it.)
To: PAR35
Keep a look out for a Brontosaurus at the butcher shop, then we’ll talk.
25 posted on
08/01/2007 8:12:52 PM PDT by
SengirV
To: PAR35
Coelacanths used to be some of the best empirical evidence for evolution - until one turned up in a fish market.Which changed what, exactly?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson