Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meyer
One assumes it was thoroughly engineered; however, in that picture, to my eye, the vertical steel supports directly over the concrete pylons appear...skinny....as they are no thicker than the members forming the trangles within the truss structure(s). My implication being: The members within and forming the triangles within truss structures are either overspec'ed or the verticals directly over the concrete pylons are underspec'ed because the triangles are pretty much just in compression whereas the verticals are not only in similar compression, but have to support the weight of the whole thing. Disclosure: I'm not a structural engineer.
740 posted on 08/01/2007 5:55:56 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (When Bubba lies, the finger flies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: Attention Surplus Disorder
One assumes it was thoroughly engineered; however, in that picture, to my eye, the vertical steel supports directly over the concrete pylons appear...skinny....as they are no thicker than the members forming the trangles within the truss structure(s). My implication being: The members within and forming the triangles within truss structures are either overspec'ed or the verticals directly over the concrete pylons are underspec'ed because the triangles are pretty much just in compression whereas the verticals are not only in similar compression, but have to support the weight of the whole thing. Disclosure: I'm not a structural engineer.

I think it's a rigid structure from one end of the girder'ed section to the other, with the little pylons in the middle just to hold up the weight. The tangental support would be primarly at each end of the girder structure.

But, being a rigid structure, and being a bit aged and probably having a great deal of rusted fasteners, the structure was prime for a cascading failure as a result of a single failure.

My guess is that some important piece or brace broke - but it was something that wouldn't have caused a collapse back in 1967 when the bridge was new. However, considering that there are many old bolts or rivets, stress cracks, and other weaknesses, a simple failure and shifting load might have been all it took to cause the total collapse of the structure.

842 posted on 08/01/2007 6:07:35 PM PDT by meyer (It's the entitlements, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 740 | View Replies ]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
In that picture, to my eye, the vertical steel supports directly over the concrete pylons appear...skinny....as they are no thicker than the members forming the trangles within the truss structure(s).


855 posted on 08/01/2007 6:09:42 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 740 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson