[Anticommie]

Just a couple of notes: - The Minneapolis airport was where the Muslim cabbie incident occurred a couple of months ago (the airport commission refused to allow cabbies to refuse fares because they might be carrying alcohol) - The bridge next to the collapsed bridge has no traffic on it. Precautionary?

Construction, lot of workers, equipment, perfect environment for act of terror. Terrorist could be disguised as construction workers, any movement or presence of individual (s) under or around the bridge would not cause any suspicion, unless there is a strict security on this type of construction (I seriously doubt it).

[weegee]

Construction, lot of workers, equipment, perfect environment for act of terror. Terrorist could be disguised as construction workers, any movement or presence of individual (s) under or around the bridge would not cause any suspicion, unless there is a strict security on this type of construction (I seriously doubt it).

If there was sabotage at NASA, what is to make people think that construction of bridges and buildings is any safer from infiltration?