[torchthemummy]

My point is this website has plenty of heavyweight posters to expose Rudy as he is or isn’t. I have great respect for this forum and Jim Robinson’s creativity but when a particular candidate is not only in the keywords at the top of the latest articles page but is highlighted in red then that is active “deglamorizing.”

By the way I generally agree with that assessment, hence deglamorizing is appropriate verbage. If I didn’t agree I would have phrased it “villifying” “demonizing’ yada, yada.

My main point was that this is a particuarly anti-Republican move by NYT, brazen in it’s obvious partisanship under the guise of unbiased journalism. You may agree with the NYT’s agenda but I think that is throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

[torchthemummy]

Clarify last line: You may agree with the NYT’s agenda on this particular issue/candidate but I think that is throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

[Fred]

reply to #26

FAIR AND BALANCED???.....WE REPORT YOU DECIDE??....These are not my words, these are not my slogans, these are FNC mantras and claims to their "objective" reporting

Then there is the NYT

NYT...If y a'll could only be as intellectual as us...what a great world this would be...but alas...that could never be possible...ERGO we must take care of you. At least the NYT admits to being biased and partisan and if one does not like it they can take a hike...

FNC could be shilling form FDT, I would still have the same problem with them...GET IT????