Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama broadsides Bush in national security address
The Hill ^ | 8/1/07 | Klaus Marre

Posted on 08/01/2007 1:26:17 PM PDT by Jean S

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), in a speech in which he also advocated launching attacks against terrorists in Pakistan, on Wednesday levied heavy accusations against President Bush, including the pronouncement that Bush is “fighting the war the terrorists want us to fight” in Iraq.

“By refusing to end the war in Iraq, President Bush is giving the terrorists what they really want, and what the Congress voted to give them in 2002: a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences,” Obama said in an address at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

“[Osama bin Laden] and his allies know they cannot defeat us on the field of battle or in a genuine battle of ideas,” he added. “But they can provoke the reaction we’ve seen in Iraq: a misguided invasion of a Muslim country that sparks new insurgencies, ties down our military, busts our budgets, increases the pool of terrorist recruits, alienates America, gives democracy a bad name and prompts the American people to question our engagement in the world.”

While Obama’s remarks about Pakistan garnered the most attention, he peppered his speech with attacks on Bush.

“This administration also puts forward a false choice between the liberties we cherish and the security we demand,” said the senator, who trails Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) in the fight for the Democratic nomination. “I will provide our intelligence and law enforcement agencies with the tools they need to track and take out the terrorists without undermining our Constitution and our freedom.”

Rather than protecting the homeland, Obama charged, the Bush administration delivered “a color-coded politics of fear.”

Obama repeatedly criticized Congress for authorizing the war. At the time of the vote, Obama’s two main rivals for the nomination were in the Senate and he was serving in the Illinois state legislature.

“With that vote, Congress became co-author of a catastrophic war,” he said.

In the most-discussed part of the speech, Obama said he would make U.S. military aid to Pakistan contingent on the country taking on the terrorists that are seeking a haven in the border region between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

“I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges,” Obama said, but added, “if we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: barackhusseinobamajr; electionpresident; lendmeyourears; obama; obamaosama; pakistan; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 08/01/2007 1:26:22 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Broadside? Lol! The Obama sloop is to small of a vessel.
2 posted on 08/01/2007 1:27:58 PM PDT by SolidWood (UN delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I really don't think Obama knows what the hell he is talking about. Mrs. Clinton must be delighted.
3 posted on 08/01/2007 1:32:44 PM PDT by b4its2late (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: JeanS

Yeah, Obama wants to withdraw all of the troops from Iraq, leaving a vacuum, and invade our nuclear armed ally Pakistan instead.

This guy is such a lightweight it’s amazing he hasn’t blown away in the wind like Mary Poppins.


5 posted on 08/01/2007 1:37:00 PM PDT by counterpunch ("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stm

I’m going to tell BOR about you.


6 posted on 08/01/2007 1:38:54 PM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

“...we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship...” What some long-ago Democrat said about meeting challenges resolutely.

Now — “It costs too much, we’re bored, it’s too hard...”


7 posted on 08/01/2007 1:40:15 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Wow, after that speach I’m SURE Bush won’t get reelected in 08!


8 posted on 08/01/2007 1:45:31 PM PDT by whatexit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

If people don’t see what a fool this guy is...wet, really wet behind those big ears and NOT ready for the national stage.

Get out of Iraq and invade another sovereign country. Sure, that’ll work!/s


9 posted on 08/01/2007 1:48:21 PM PDT by toddlintown (Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

This is guy should never have been elected to any office. He is really ignorant.


10 posted on 08/01/2007 1:50:01 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore (If it ain't Rugby or Bullriding, it's for girls.........................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Obama knows about as much about National Security as Mickey Mouse knows about the Hubble telescope...

Why to people take this puppy seriously ?


11 posted on 08/01/2007 1:52:28 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
By refusing to end the war in Iraq, President Bush

We have here an example of a logical disconnect. If the other side stopped blowing up vegetable markets and children and other stuff and stopped kidnapping and shooting their enemies and doing other antisocial things, the US would be out of there so quick that Reid and Pelosi wouldn't know it was over for a month and would still be talking about 'ending the war' a month after it was actually over.

12 posted on 08/01/2007 1:52:51 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

He’s a Tough Boy sung to song by Hall and Oates, She’s a Rich Girl!


13 posted on 08/01/2007 2:06:02 PM PDT by rocksblues (Just enforce the law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

This metrosexual girlyman couldn’t broadside anyone. He has no manhood... no class... no experience and NO GRAVITAS! He does have big ears that grow bigger with each lie.

LLS


14 posted on 08/01/2007 2:10:13 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Apparently the poor moron is unaware that Bush is not running in 2008. Let him waste his time attacking a foe that is leaving the stage while anyone with brains is looking forward.

He just keeps exposing his lack of credentials.

15 posted on 08/01/2007 2:14:39 PM PDT by McGavin999 ("Hard is not Hopeless" General Petraeus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

So in the same speech he said Iraq is too complex for us to occupy, but invading Pakistan to control what’s happening in Waziristan and maintain a friendly government in control of their nukes would work out better.

He-heh.....
Ho-ho-ho-ho-ho....
BWHWAAAH-HAAAAH-HAAAH-haaah-ha.
He-he...

</wiping eyes>
...What an idiot


16 posted on 08/01/2007 2:14:58 PM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Yeah right. Like Obama really has the experience to tell anyone anything about national defense, the military or anything else.


17 posted on 08/01/2007 2:15:37 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"CLINTON: Good evening.

Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.

The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world.

The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people."

President Clinton
Oval Office Address to the American People
December 16, 1998

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html

18 posted on 08/01/2007 2:17:59 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

I’d call this guy Doogie Howser, except Doogie was more believable.

I’m starting to think he was put up by Clinton’s people so that by comparison she would look presidential.


19 posted on 08/01/2007 2:18:56 PM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
“By refusing to end the war in Iraq, President Bush is giving the terrorists what they really want, and what the Congress voted to give them in 2002: a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences,”

President Bush is refusing to end the war? I thought all those nut-jobs running around Iraq blowing up anything and anyone they can put a bomb next to were doing that.

BHO must have gotten some real bad poll numbers after last week's debate, because every day since he's come out swinging more and more wildly!

20 posted on 08/01/2007 2:21:29 PM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson