Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leatherneck_MT; John Valentine

It would depend on what in the salt water is being burned. If the chemical reation is H2O —RF energy—> H2 + O2 —combustion—> H2O, then the RF generator would consume more energy than is liberated by burning hydrogen. On the other hand, if there something else in the salt water that is burning, then it is possible, in theory, for a net energy gain.


18 posted on 08/01/2007 8:58:10 AM PDT by Fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Fudd

Thank you, at least your response was intelligent. I am not familiar with this stuff as I’m no scientist or what have you and frankly have no interest in it. But I do know that people that come on threads of this nature and laugh and pooh pooh ideas that people are working on are the same types of individuals that told the Wright brothers they would never fly.

I’m glad there are people like that still in this world that will go out and try and do something regardless of those “who know better”.


21 posted on 08/01/2007 9:00:57 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Famously frisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Fudd
On the other hand, if there something else in the salt water that is burning,...

Just as a point of interest, Elmer, would you care to clue us in as to just what this burning substance in sea water might be that we can extract with a net efficiency gain?

If you can identify it, great fame and fortune await you.

31 posted on 08/01/2007 9:27:18 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson