Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jews, Muslims, Democrats
Ha'aertz ^ | 8-1-07

Posted on 08/01/2007 7:42:54 AM PDT by SJackson

I'd like to move to yet another topic - some might find a connection to the one we started with - and to another article you wrote, reacting to the study by Walt and Mearsheimer on the so-called Israel lobby.

In this article you say that "the wonder is not that" such ideas have "come back into circulation in the United States in a moment of high international tension. The wonder is that those ideas, thinly camouflaged in professorial doubletalk, are being seriously peddled not by the likes of Ford and Coughlin but by two highly respected professors from the heart of the American academic establishment.

An even greater source of wonder, and of dismay, is that those ideas have met with a large degree of acceptance in the elite circles from which Walt and Mearsheimer hail."

As the Walt-Mearsheimer book publication date is getting nearer, how worried should one be about this academic acceptance of the legitimacy of this duo's work?

In your recent article Jews, Muslims and Democrats you write that "thanks in part to the stubbornly lopsided Jewish allegiance to the Democratic Party, the influence wielded by the Jewish community has not been increasing but receding, even while the numerical representation of Jews in public office has grown".

1. How can it be that more Jewish representatives have less influence?

2. Can you please specify some areas in which such receding influence is already visible?

(Excerpt) Read more at haaretz.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bookreview; dems; israel; jewishvote; mearsheimer

1 posted on 08/01/2007 7:42:56 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

No land for peace...not now not ever.


2 posted on 08/01/2007 7:48:08 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
"No land for peace...not now not ever"

But...but..it worked so well in Gaza.

3 posted on 08/01/2007 7:50:15 AM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

Thread to the referenced article, s, Muslims, and the Democrats

4 posted on 08/01/2007 7:50:21 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
“How can it be”

It is still surprising to me that supposed intelligent people are surprised by the duplicity and audacity of the liberal elite. The lynch mob mentality of the Duke faculty was not an aberration. This crowd gets their moral standards for the day from the television and their own delusional sense of self-importance. Not surprised.

5 posted on 08/01/2007 8:04:06 AM PDT by CarryingOn (America will not survive another Clinton presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson