So why don’t you address Seavey’s arguments, instead of posting cutesy and overdone graphics?
And for those who say it can’t happen, here’s the beauty part: Get Paul through the primaries to the Republican nomination,
Impossible. He's an anti-war isolationist who loves blaming America.
... and he has the tools to take on Hillary.
Hillary would carry 50 states and DC against L.Ron.
He plainly gets the libertarian swing voters that the Republicans lost in 2006
How many are they? Are we even talking six digits?
...he should garner most conservative votes when contrasted with Hillary...
A third-party conservative would get those, or we'd stay home.
...and — here’s the clincher — he gets a huge share of the bourgeoning antiwar vote to boot.
Absurd. The left is not going to vote for a pro-life pro-gun candidate when they can have their socialized-medicine heroine Hillary.
This article, like most praise of L.Ron, is blissfully, purposely separated from reality.