Just out of curiosity, did you find Seavey’s reasoning so cogent you can’t argue with it?
I mean, if you despise Paul that much, you must have something to say to the actual thesis of the article.
I don’t despise L.Ron. I find him to be a laughably pathetic creature, commendably pro-life but damnably anti-American and isolationist regarding the Battle of Iraq specifically, and national security in general. This would be bad enough without his flaky “gold v. fiat money” fetish.