Replies

I know Fjordman and he gets the urgency of securing our borders and maintaining our sovereignty better than most Americans. I saw all of this coming and it gives me no great pleasure to say that this isn’t even the tip of the iceberg.

I think that Bush, in his 8 years, had he acted could have saved us all a great deal of chaos. I think the situation reached critical mass about 5 years ago and it’s going to be very difficult to turn back the tide.

Attrition alone, is not the solution. These people will not return without a fight and it will take leaders of great courage and direction to weather the coming storm. The media are going to be playing the “breaking up families” meme to the nth degree and many will break with their convictions.

Fjordman is absolutely correct, as per usual. I knew this was coming and I realize like all thinking people we are also at war with radical islam for the preservation of Western Society. I don’t want my country to be a release valve for the corrupt government of Mexico. There are few that realize just how quickly we can turn into a 3rd world cesspool. This election is going to be very different from any other. Every question I have about what kind of leader we need for what’s ahead is always answered, Duncan Hunter. It is going to take energy, wisdom and someone up for the fight and I just don’t see that in any of the rest. Congress is going to need a thorough cleaning as well. If American’s don’t wise up in this one, and they play politics and follow polls as usual, they may wake up in a very different America from the one of which they are accustomed.

Something being missed is looking at the deadly war between the Dems and Reps over the greatest prize in world history since Helen of Troy. It is the battle joined over the implementation of the ‘mythical’ North American Union. G. Soros ‘owns’ the Dem party..he is a Canadian...the election of 2008, if the Dems win will be his win. The post graduate trainees for the Parliament...remember Newt Gingrich talking on fox news about a parliamentary structure of govt maybe in our interest to prevent ‘gridlock’?..he was indirectly referring to the NAU. The trainees are in the 4th or 5th year of training from all three countries...they were in Mexico last year. The Republicans have had all the control of the attempted implementation for the last 7 years...the Dems want it...their desperation is rising rapidly...the first 100 days of the Dem Congress has resulted only in 300 congressional investigations against the Reps...Conyers needs only 3 members of the House to begin impeachment proceedings for the Pres. They are fighting over our carcass. Guiterrez of the Dept of COmmerce, Rice of the State Dept. and Chertoff of Homeland Security are the three appointed administrators of the effort..each country has three. Start doing searches for North American union, amero, the proposed new currency. All the info regarding what the parties are really fighting over is readily available. Go to www.eagleforum.org, scroll to the bottom, click on North American Union, and begin...many, many articles...12, maybe up to 17 states have now passed resolutions in one house or the other, but not both, to resist the implementation of such a union between Mexico, Canada and the US. A major meeting was held this June, one this month, and a big one in Quebec in August driven by large international corps for ‘guidance’ of the project. Internat. corps want to to bsns. with Islam and both parties are not imposing its rapid political, economic, cultural spread here..we are assaulted from the South, the North, the Middle East, and from Asia...more and more are beginning to notice..the more that notice, the less kindly we will be treated.

I think that Bush, in his 8 years, had he acted could have saved us all a great deal of chaos. I think the situation reached critical mass about 5 years ago and it’s going to be very difficult to turn back the tide.

>You misunderstand. Bush wanted a "new America". He thinks it's what is best for all of us.

THE "NEW AMERICAN".....

.....<

We are now one of the largest Spanish-speaking nations in the world. We're a major source of Latin music, journalism and culture.

Just go to Miami, or San Antonio, Los Angeles, Chicago or West New York, New Jersey ... and close your eyes and listen. You could just as easily be in Santo Domingo or Santiago, or San Miguel de Allende.

For years our nation has debated this change -- some have praised it and others have resented it. By nominating me, my party has made a choice to welcome the new America.

As I speak, we are celebrating the success of democracy in Mexico.

George Bush from a campaign speech in Miami, August 2000.

You can read the speech here.

Here is an excerpt of a good critique of that speech:

In equating our intimate historic bonds to our mother country and to Canada with our ties to Mexico, W. shows a staggering ignorance of the civilizational facts of life. The reason we are so close to Britain and Canada is that we share with them a common historical culture, language, literature, and legal system, as well as similar standards of behavior, expectations of public officials, and so on. My Bush Epiphany By Lawrence Auster

The Path to National Suicide by Lawrence Auster (1990)

An essay on multi-culturalism and immigration.

Click the Pic!!!!

Excerpt....

How can we account for this remarkable silence? The answer, as I will try to show, is that when the Immigration Reform Act of 1965 was being considered in Congress, the demographic impact of the bill was misunderstood and downplayed by its sponsors. As a result, the subject of population change was never seriously examined. The lawmakers’ stated intention was that the Act should not radically transform America’s ethnic character; indeed, it was taken for granted by liberals such as Robert Kennedy that it was in the nation’s interest to avoid such a change. But the dramatic ethnic transformation that has actually occurred as a result of the 1965 Act has insensibly led to acceptance of that transformation in the form of a new, multicultural vision of American society. Dominating the media and the schools, ritualistically echoed by every politician, enforced in every public institution, this orthodoxy now forbids public criticism of the new path the country has taken. “We are a nation of immigrants,” we tell ourselves— and the subject is closed. The consequences of this code of silence are bizarre. One can listen to statesmen and philosophers agonize over the multitudinous causes of our decline, and not hear a single word about the massive immigration from the Third World and the resulting social divisions. Opponents of population growth, whose crusade began in the 1960s out of a concern about the growth rate among resident Americans and its effects on the environment and the quality of life, now studiously ignore the question of immigration, which accounts for fully half of our population growth.

This curious inhibition stems, of course, from a paralyzing fear of the charge of “racism.” The very manner in which the issue is framed—as a matter of equal rights and the blessings of diversity on one side, versus “racism” on the other—tends to cut off all rational discourse on the subject. One can only wonder what would happen if the proponents of open immigration allowed the issue to be discussed, not as a moralistic dichotomy, but in terms of its real consequences. Instead of saying: “We believe in the equal and unlimited right of all people to immigrate to the U.S. and enrich our land with their diversity,” what if they said: “We believe in an immigration policy which must result in a staggering increase in our population, a revolution in our culture and way of life, and the gradual submergence of our current population by Hispanic and Caribbean and Asian peoples.” Such frankness would open up an honest debate between those who favor a radical change in America’s ethnic and cultural identity and those who think this nation should preserve its way of life and its predominant, European-American character. That is the actual choice—as distinct from the theoretical choice between “equality” and “racism”—that our nation faces. But the tyranny of silence has prevented the American people from freely making that choice.

I’m starting to think the only issue that really matters this election is the border, and only Tancredo or Hunter is serious about closing it and enforcing the law.

We could maybe win with a different cfr type republican but by the time the next election rolls around we’ll be hopelessly outnumbered by tens of millions more third world migrants who will be solid democrats.

“There are few that realize just how quickly we can turn into a 3rd world cesspool.”

One silver lining... more people across the country realize it now that they have seen their own cities change completely in just a few years. Also, this is personal - their homes, their greatest investment, being threatened - not just something you’re reading about that’s happening thousands of miles away.