Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis: Fred Thompson Faces Few Bumps
Examiner ^ | July 31, 2007 | LIZ SIDOTI, AP

Posted on 07/31/2007 3:54:11 PM PDT by mdittmar

Republican Fred Thompson has faced a series of bumps in his preliminary campaign, casting doubt on the strength of his would-be candidacy and raising questions about his potential for success.

Despite the difficulties, the "Law & Order" actor and former Tennessee senator continues to post strong marks in national surveys and early primary state polls five months before voting begins. But his transformation from a man simply flirting with a bid to one on the brink of an official candidacy has been far from smooth the past few months.

His challenge: living up to the hopes of dispirited Republicans searching for a conservative to rally around in the wide-open race.

"The expectation levels are sky high right now, so that means if you don't meet them financially, you don't meet them organizationally and you don't meet them message-wise, you're in trouble," said Joe Gaylord, a Republican consultant close to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who also may enter the GOP race.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatives; electionpresident; elections; fredthompson; gop; republicans; rfr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
It's early,it may get a little bumpy.
1 posted on 07/31/2007 3:54:12 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

If FR is a barometer, it will get real bumpy.


2 posted on 07/31/2007 3:55:29 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

The author, at the link, is Liz Sidoti of the Associated Press.


3 posted on 07/31/2007 3:56:37 PM PDT by Petronski (imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Hmm, let’s see... He’s stumbling, failing, but, gosh, he’s posting good marks in the national polls and early primary state polls. Let’s write about the troubled campaign...

I’d fire anyone who served this trash up.

4 posted on 07/31/2007 3:57:38 PM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu
I’d fire anyone who served this trash up.

That'd be the estimable--or is that execrable--Liz Sidoti of the AP.


5 posted on 07/31/2007 3:58:42 PM PDT by Petronski (imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom; jellybean; Clara Lou; Fred; perfect_rovian_storm; Politicalmom

More anti-Fred leftist media craptasms.


6 posted on 07/31/2007 4:00:42 PM PDT by Petronski (imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

Al’Propaganda


7 posted on 07/31/2007 4:04:51 PM PDT by xcamel ("It's Talk Thompson Time!" >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

What, you don’t think “Can America accept a trophy wife as First Lady” and “Campaign manager quits over clashes with Jeri Thomson” isn’t bumpy enough?


8 posted on 07/31/2007 4:11:09 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
If FR is a barometer, it will get real bumpy.

Only from the besotted few.

9 posted on 07/31/2007 4:16:17 PM PDT by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingu

“Hmm, let’s see... He’s stumbling, failing, but, gosh, he’s posting good marks in the national polls and early primary state polls. Let’s write about the troubled campaign...”

Which means that the Paulaholics and MSM are failing.


10 posted on 07/31/2007 4:18:18 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
If Fred wasn’t a serious threat the liberal media wouldn’t be trying to kneecap him even before he declares his candidacy.
11 posted on 07/31/2007 4:20:10 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

Try exploring the conservative blogosphere. Even if we can’t beat up on Fred here, its not polite out there either.


12 posted on 07/31/2007 4:22:24 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
With so many, including the Fox All Stars tonight, professing Fred’s early demise, let me share with you a bit of History that I found. Read below and learn how History can repeat itself. Seems there are more than just a few things Fred and Ronaldo Maximus have in common!


LLS

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/barone/2007/7/11/the-implosion-of-the-mccain-campaign.html

Michael Barrone

“Ronald Reagan fired his divisive campaign manager John Sears after winning the New Hampshire primary in 1980 and still won the Republican nomination and the general election.”


Brad Warthen’s Blog

TheStatecomAbout Brad Warthen’s Blog

http://blogs.thestate.com/bradwarthensblog/2007/07/mccain-2008reag.html

CAMPAIGN SHAKE-UP

During 1980 Campaign, Reagan “Had To Overcome Doubts About His Age And Ability, An Ill-Advised Iowa Strategy, A Major Staff Shake-Up In The Middle Of The Campaign And Serious Money Problems.” “It is true that Reagan entered the campaign with enormous assets. … But Reagan had to overcome doubts about his age and ability, an ill-advised Iowa strategy, a major staff shake-up in the middle of the campaign and serious money problems.” (Lou Cannon, “Reagan: Iowa Loss Allowed Him To Campaign His Way,” The Washington Post, 6/1/80)

“The Shake-Up Of His Campaign Staff” Seen As Contributing Factor To Reagan’s Primary Victory. “The shake-up of his campaign staff and his more personal style of campaigning have contributed to Reagan’s commanding lead for the Republican nomination. To William J. Casey, Ronald Reagan’s reconstructed campaign proves that even in election politics, one can ‘make a virtue out of necessity.’ … Casey … was referring to the recent radical changes in the former California governor’s campaign strategy and staff operations.” (Dom Bonafede, “The ‘Liberation’ Of Ronald Reagan – A New Staff And A New Strategy,” National Journal, 3/22/80)

Reagan Struggled With Early Fundraising

In July 1979, Fundraising Reports Placed Reagan Fourth Among Republican Presidential Candidates, While First In Spending. “Ronald Reagan, regarded as a leading candidate for the 1980 Republican presidential nomination, is trailing other GOP candidates in financial contributions this year, according to federal reports. The Federal Election Commission said Wednesday that Reagan’s campaign committee has reported $1.4 million in contributions so far this year. That compares with these other GOP presidential contenders and the funds they have reported raising: Rep. Philip M. Crane of Illinois, $2.5 million. Former Texas Gov. John Connally, $2.2 million. Former CIA Director George Bush, $1.5 million. … And although Reagan wasn’t the leading fund-raiser, he was the biggest spender, using nearly $1.3 million of the $1.4 million he raised.” (“Washington Dateline,” The Associated Press, 7/19/79)

· “While It Has A $121,000 Cash Surplus, According To The Latest Campaign Finance Reports, The Reagan Campaign Committee Has $141,741 In Debts And Obligations, Much Of It Owed To A West Coast Direct Mail Firm.” (Fred Barbash, “Reagan Raises $1.4 Million In Campaign Funds,” The Washington Post, 7/26/79)

In August 1979, “[L]yn Nofziger, A Longtime Reagan Aide, Was Removed As Finance Director.” (Bill Peterson, “Specter of Kennedy Casts Shadow On GOP Politics,” The Washington Post, 9/23/79)

By September Of 1979, Reagan’s Campaign Was $500,000 In Debt. “The only serious weakness in the Reagan effort is fund raising. In late August, the campaign found itself almost $500,000 in debt …” (Bill Peterson, “Specter of Kennedy Casts Shadow On GOP Politics,” The Washington Post, 9/23/79)

In January 1980, Reagan’s Campaign Abandoned Plans To Run The Campaign Without Federal Matching Funds And The Corresponding Spending Limits, After Coming To The “[R]ealization That Its Fundraisers Could Not Gather Enough Contributions To Run The Campaign Without Federal Money …” “Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign yesterday accepted a federal check for $100,000, ending weeks of internal debate over whether Reagan should accept federal matching funds and the spending limits that go with them. It was the Reagan campaign’s first such check. Its second will be far larger. … The decision reflects the Reagan campaign’s realization that its fundraisers could not gather enough contributions to run the campaign without federal money, campaign treasurer Bay Buchanan said. ‘Our feeling was, don’t take matching funds until you have to, she said.” (“GOP Chairman Says It’s Time For Debate on U.S. Hostages,” The Washington Post, 1/26/80)

As Voting Period Approached, Reagan Had Staff Shakeup

In Late 1979, Then-Campaign Director John Sears “Eased Out” Group Of Longtime Reagan Advisers, Including Lyn Nofziger And Mike Deaver. “Recently, three of Reagan’s oldest and most conservative advisers – deputy campaign chairmen Lyn Nofziger and Mike Deaver, and issues man Marty Anderson – have been eased out of his campaign by John Sears, the pragmatic chairman. Some Reagan loyalists worry that the changes portend a more moderate campaign tack, thus alienating hardline conservatives.” (“The Bumpy Campaign Trail,” Newsweek, 12/17/79)

Deaver’s Dismissal Left Sears In “Undisputed Control Of The Campaign.” “Three topsiders in Ronald Reagan’s Presidential campaign have been pushed overboard in the last three months … Such fears were given new credence last week when Michael Deaver, a friend and conservative adviser to Reagan for fourteen years, was forced out of the campaign because he had been operating outside the chain of command of manager John Sears, who now stands in undisputed control of the campaign.” (Dennis Williams, “Reagan’s Campaign Shake-Up,” Newsweek, 12/10/79)

After Losing Iowa Caucuses, Reagan Fired Campaign Manager And Entire Top Layer Of Political Aides

1980: After Losing Iowa Caucuses, Then-Gov. Ronald Reagan Vowed – According To A Campaign Aide – “There’s Going To Be Some Changes.” “As Ronald Reagan sees it, the seeds of his victory in the Republican presidential contest were sown in the dark hours of defeat after the Iowa precinct caucuses last Jan. 21. … Chief of staff Edwin Meese recalls Reagan saying grimly to him the same night, ‘There’s going to be some changes.’” (Lou Cannon, “Reagan: Iowa Loss Allowed Him To Campaign His Way,” The Washington Post, 6/1/80)

On Day Of New Hampshire Primary, Reagan Dismissed Campaign Manager, Political Director And Press Secretary. “Feb. 26, New Hampshire – Reagan defeats Bush nearly 2 to 1 and regains his status as front-runner. The afternoon of his victory he fires Sears, political director Charles Black and press secretary Jim Lake in a shakeup that in effect restored Reagan as head of his own campaign. Former Securities and Exchange Commission chairman William J. Casey is brought in as campaign director and Meese, whose Sears’ attempt to fire triggered the timing of his own dismissal, becomes chief of staff.” (Lou Cannon, “Reagan: Iowa Loss Allowed Him To Campaign His Way,” The Washington Post, 6/1/80)

Dismissal Of Sears Triggered “Massive Housecleaning Of The Reagan Operation. “Sears, the campaign’s executive vice chairman and chief strategist until he was fired on Feb. 26, antagonized many of Reagan’s conservative backers and California friends by attempting to package the candidate in too moderate a guise and devising his unsuccessful low profile Iowa campaign. … On the day of the primary, Sears was summarily fired, along with two of his closest associates … Several other campaign aides aligned with Sears also left, either voluntarily or by request, in what amounted to a massive housecleaning of the Reagan operation.” (Dom Bonafede, “The ‘Liberation’ Of Ronald Reagan – A New Staff And A New Strategy,” National Journal, 3/22/80)

· Dismissed Reagan Staffer: “We Had No Idea … That This Was Going To Happen.” “A member of Reagan’s Washington office, who was among those let go, said the dismissals came as a surprise. ‘We knew there was contention, but we had no idea how bad it was or that this was going to happen.’” (Dom Bonafede, “The ‘Liberation’ Of Ronald Reagan – A New Staff And A New Strategy,” National Journal, 3/22/80)

13 posted on 07/31/2007 4:26:13 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

DNC talking points are making the round.


14 posted on 07/31/2007 4:26:30 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I sure won’t vote for that POS trophy husband of Hillary’s!!!!!.....


15 posted on 07/31/2007 4:26:44 PM PDT by GitmoSailor (AZ Cold War Vet===Fairness Doctrine for TV First!!!!!.....I'Am With Fred)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
kneecap him?

Read the article.

16 posted on 07/31/2007 4:26:48 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“Everybody’s got a dog in the fight” as Michael Vick would say.


17 posted on 07/31/2007 4:28:56 PM PDT by Starstruck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pissant

As well it should. We have to live with these guys for at least 4 years...


18 posted on 07/31/2007 4:29:24 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I am not really a Fred basher, I just play one on Free Republic. THOMPSON 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

Exactly. And yet some folks round here think that is not the way it should be. It’s the way its always been.


19 posted on 07/31/2007 4:30:03 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Very interesting, I had forgotten those long ago details, but my how the can be replayed...


20 posted on 07/31/2007 4:31:29 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I am not really a Fred basher, I just play one on Free Republic. THOMPSON 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson