Posted on 07/30/2007 4:48:06 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007
Edited on 07/31/2007 9:40:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Fair and correct are two different things. I would settle for a 50% sales tax, as long as it was flat, because I guarantee you that it would be 15% or less within 5 years.
The entire point of the Fair Tax is to make people realize what the government is costing them. When you take away withholding, flatten the tax, and present it to them several times a day, 95% of Americans will scream out for tax cuts.
The dollar amount of tax is the same. Whether you’re quoting the tax inclusive rate or the tax exclusive rate.
Odd. The title on ABC News was different when I posted it.
Exactly, Fred’s safety net is the fact congress will most lkely never pass it.
Don’t call it a sales tax if it is computed differently than every other sales tax currently in use on the consumer level in the USA.
Ah, no wonder.
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22Duncan+Hunter%22&ie=UTF-8&scoring=n
The title was presented differently on Google News.
If true, that’s a good sign. However, the Fair Tax plan is irrelevant as it will never see the light of day. What’s important is not this piece of legislation but the desire to reduce taxes within the existing system.
Well how long do you think it would take people to demand the tax be lowered. See if all pay the same percentage it will wake up alot of dead beats who think taxes are a good thing. Every time the .gov wants to increase taxes they will have to increase them on EVERYONE!!!!! Plus you have much more economic FREEDOM. YOU decide what YOU want to buy and pay taxes on. It is a WONDERFUL idea.
The point is that the “23%” rate is deceptive labeling. In the same way that a state sales tax is 6% of the base price, this tax would be 29% on the base price.
The elite may have to grit their teeth and do something like the fair tax, given Tom Cryer’s recent court win.......
Do you find that the random uppercasing of words helps you prove your point?
I agree, you have the freedom to break your Oath. no one will arrest you.
Few will even remind you of it.
Still, We took an Oath:
To defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Hunter and Paul are the only two who have not attacked the Constitution with their votes in Congress.
Only you can control your Honor.
You one-percenters have some strange tactics for trying to gain support for your candidates.
You might discover you do your cause a lot more harm than good.
Of course that might be part of the reason they’re polling at <1%.
I am sorry but 23% is too forking high.
Try 10% and then I’d say okay. 23% is friggin socialism. I’m paying a lot less under the current system. I want my taxes to go DOWN, not UP.
a sales tax only hits the middle class, it is a DISASTER. The illegals and lower class will buy everything on the underground economy.
I am here to remind Veterans of their Duty.
everyone can check voting records now. What a pol says on the campaign trail does not matter.
If you are not a vet, my message is not for you.
I am appealing to the heroes who put America first.
Few sacrificed for the common good like we did.
Our mission is not over just because we are not on active duty
Look at the voting records, it is easy, 1+1=2
It is not like we have a lot of choice.
If you don't understand Ron Pauls foreign policy, you can go with Hunter.
Neither has attacked the Constitution, that which we promised to defend.
>> We took an Oath: To defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic
You’re right! I remember taking that oath.
Let’s review the facts.
Al Queda is the enemy of US.
Al Queda is fighting us in Iraq.
Ron Paul wants US to cut and run out of Iraq. Leave with our tail between our legs while leaving our foreign enemy to hurt us.
Ron Paul is an isolationist maniac who would allow US to die at the hands of our foreign enemies.
Ron Paul is supported by a number of our moonbat domestic enemies, simply because he wants to turn tail in Iraq.
Add it all up, and I must conclude that because I love my country and swore to defend it, I could never vote for Ron Paul.
Thanks so much for reminding me that the oath I took is yet /another/ good reason not to vote for Ron Paul.
How is getting Hillary elected and allowing the Clintons to dance around the 22nd amendment “defending the constitution”?
I would really like to know.
Wow, no investigation into Fred’s record? Somehow I get the feeling I’m watching molasses being poured in January in NH when listening to Fred.
How about gun control?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.